The 2025 NBA Draft class continues to take shape, and with March approaching, it's time for an updated, fully revisededition of Big Board 3.0—now expanded to my top 75 prospects. This is the third iteration of my rankings, following my initial top 25 and picks 26 through 50, but this time, it’s a complete breakdown of the most draftable players in this class. Truthfully, I could have extended the list even further, as I currently have nearly 100 names I believe are worthy of being drafted or signed to two-way contracts. Of course, not all of them will enter the draft, as some will return to school or remain overseas, but as of today, this is how I see the class stacking up.

My top three remains unchanged, with Duke’s Cooper Flagg and Rutgers’ freshman duo of Dylan Harper and Ace Bailey leading the way. However, in my eyes, the real intrigue begins at pick No. 4. In this article, I’ll be fully transparent, sharing my thoughts on what I like and what concerns me about each prospect—whether minor or significant.

This is my honest, no-fluff evaluation based on updated statistics as of February 25th and where things currently stand in the ever-changing 2025 draft landscape.

1. Cooper Flagg

DukeFreshmanCombo Forward6’9” | 205Age on draft night: 18.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 1

Cooper Flagg has been as good as advertised—but to be honest, he’s been even better than I expected. He currently leads Duke in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks, and you can see the steady improvements he’s made to his offensive game throughout the season. Flagg has consistently shown up in big games, delivering on both ends of the floor. Defensively, he’s been dominant, but it’s his offensive versatility, competitive fire, athleticism, and skill set that have truly stood out. The fact that he came into the season with immense hype and has not only met but exceeded expectations—while leading Duke to a 24-3 record—is a testament to just how good he actually is.

One of the most impressive things about Flagg is his toughness. Even with defenses entirely geared to stop him, he finds ways to impact the game and impose his will. He’s also a really good passer—comfortable making plays out of ball screens, the short roll, and double teams. He can find shooters and make interior passes in tight spaces, which makes him even more dangerous as a lead option.

There’s not much to criticize without overanalyzing. He’s now shooting 37% from three, which has exceeded my expectations, and he continues to show growth as a shooter. If you’re looking for areas to improve, you could point to his handle needing some tightening or the fact that he’s converting just 51% of his non-dunk finishes around the rim. But at that point, you’re digging deep.

Right now, there’s no real debate—Cooper Flagg has clearly separated himself from the rest of the pack, and in my eyes, he’s a 100% lock to be the first player taken in the 2025 NBA Draft.

2. Dylan Harper

RutgersFreshmanCombo Guard6’6” | 215Age on draft night: 19.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 2

Dylan Harper remains locked in at No. 2 and is finally back to looking like himself after dealing with illness and injuries. Over his last two games, he’s been outstanding—dropping 34 points against Washington on 9-of-18 shooting, including 4-of-8 from three, while getting to the line 14 times and converting 12. He also added five rebounds and three assists in that performance. Then on Sunday, he followed it up with 25 points, nine assists, and six steals on an efficient 9-of-13 shooting, once again going 4-of-8 from deep. Harper has now made eight of his last 16 threes and is 18-of-31 from the floor in that span, further solidifying the gap between him and his Rutgers teammate, Ace Bailey, at No. 3.

A combination of illness and an ankle injury had taken some of the shine off what has otherwise been a brilliant freshman season, which definitely impacted his rhythm. That said, when he’s been fully healthy, Harper has looked every bit like the high-level prospect he was projected to be. His ability to control the pace, create for himself and others, and apply pressure on defenses as a downhill scorer remains among the best in this class.

As far as concerns go, the main thing I’d like to see from Dylan Harper is improvement as a pull-up shooter. Right now, he’s only hitting 29% of his pull-up jumpers, and considering that 121 of his 177 jump shot attempts this season have come off the dribble, that’s a key area for growth. On the flip side, he’s actually been a pretty efficient shooter off the catch, but the sample size is significantly smaller—almost 40 fewer attempts—which makes it harder to fully trust just yet.

For Harper to maximize his potential as a true three-level scorer, he’ll need to become a more consistent threat off the dribble. With his strength, touch, and ability to get to his spots, there’s reason to believe he can improve, but right now, it’s the biggest swing skill in his game.

3. Ace Bailey

RutgersFreshmanWing6’10” | 200Age on draft night: 18.8

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 3

Ace Bailey’s freshman season has been nothing short of an experience. When he’s locked in, he’s one of the most electrifying scorers I’ve ever seen. He can pile up points in a hurry, and when he gets hot, the rim must look like the size of the Atlantic Ocean. He’s already had multiple jaw-dropping scoring performances this season, putting up 39 points on 16-of-29 shooting against Indiana, 30 points on an absurd 13-of-15 shooting against Penn State, and 37 points on 13-of-20 shooting against Northwestern. What makes those performances even more impressive is the sheer difficulty of some of the shots he takes—he’s not just getting easy looks; he’s hitting tough, contested jumpers at an elite clip. Beyond his scoring, Bailey has been effective on the glass, averaging just under eight rebounds per game, and he’s also shooting a strong percentage from three.

But with all the highs, there are definitely some concerns. His shot selection can lead to some ice-cold nights—he went 3-of-15 from the field against Michigan, 4-of-17 against Michigan State, and 3-of-16 against Wisconsin. His shot diet is heavy on contested looks, which explains some of his inconsistency, but overall, he’s still managing to shoot 46% from the field and 36% from three while averaging 18 points and 7.2 rebounds per game.

The other big concern is his passing—or lack thereof. He’s averaging just one assist per game and has a rough 31-to-55 assist-to-turnover ratio. He’s not a natural playmaker for others at this stage, and that’s an area where he’ll need real development. His free throw shooting (69%) has also been inconsistent, but he has at least improved his free throw rate, which is encouraging.

For Bailey to take the next step, he’ll need to tighten his handle and refine his shot selection. Adding strength should also help him get to his spots more efficiently and absorb contact better. The talent is undeniable—he just needs to round out the rest of his game.

4. Khaman Maluach

DukeFreshmanCenter7’2” | 250Age on draft night: 18.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 6

In my opinion, the draft really starts at No. 4, and while there are plenty of good options—Tre Johnson, VJ Edgecombe, and others—I’m going with Khaman Maluach. I think Maluach has the potential to be a high-level NBA starter for 10-plus years. Even though he’s only scored in double figures once his last seven games, I’m still very intrigued by his upside and potential. He has excellent positional size, the makings of a true defensive anchor, and at the very least, he should thrive as a play finisher and rim protector. I also like the fact that he’s competitive and plays with energy. We’ve seen plenty of high-upside bigs go early in the draft in recent years with concerns about their motor, but Maluach doesn’t have those same red flags.

As for concerns, the main one is his inconsistency on offense. He has stretches where he’s a complete non-factor, which is something to monitor. Of course, playing alongside Cooper Flagg and Kon Knueppel on a loaded Duke team means he’s not getting a ton of touches, but even within that context, there are games where he just disappears offensively. That said, if you compare where Maluach is now to where Dereck Lively II was at the same stage, you can see a pretty clear developmental path for him.

His situation at the next level will be important—if he lands on a team with a good playmaker, I think he can thrive. Some of the concerns I had coming into the season about his toughness and competitive fire have been alleviated, but his offensive impact remains a work in progress.

5. Tre Johnson

TexasFreshmanCombo Guard6’6” | 185Age on draft night: 19.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 4

At No. 5, I have Tre Johnson. What I love about Johnson’s game is that he’s a true NBA-level scorer and shotmaker. He has the ability to get buckets from all over the floor and doesn’t need a ton of dribbles to get to his spots. His offensive game is smooth, efficient, and methodical—he just knows how to create space and get his shot off at a high level. I also love his competitive fire, intensity, and overall approach to the game. He’s the type of player who can step in from day one and provide instant offensive firepower to a struggling lottery team.

The concerns? He doesn’t generate a lot of trips to the free-throw line, which is something to watch as he transitions to the next level. He relies more on tough shot-making than downhill pressure, and that can make life harder for him at times. There are also some concerns about his passing.

Personally, I think he’s a better passer than he gets credit for, but I’ve had NBA scouts ask if I think he’s selfish. No, I don’t think he is—but I do understand the sentiment. Some scouts have expressed that they’d like to see him move the ball a bit more, make quicker reads, and do a better job setting up his teammates. That’s an area of growth for him, but ultimately, he’s an elite shotmaker with real scoring upside.

6. VJ Edgecombe

BaylorFreshmanWing6’5” | 180Age on draft night: 19.8

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 8

VJ Edgecombe is a player who started off high on my Big Board before the season, then completely fell out of the lottery in my last mock draft. But since the start of conference play, he’s really turned it up and started to look like the player who was widely considered a top-five pick entering the season.

What I like about Edgecombe is, first and foremost, his athleticism—he’s an elite-level athlete who plays above the rim and thrives in transition. He’s also a strong defender with the tools to be a high-level complementary player in the NBA. As long as the shot continues to fall and he leans into his connective passing, defensive versatility, and athleticism, I think he’s going to be a really valuable piece. Not necessarily a franchise guy or a go-to scorer, but a high-level role player who can thrive in a winning environment.

The concerns? Earlier in the season, he really struggled in Baylor’s matchups against ranked opponents and was highly inefficient, which raised some red flags about his ability to impact games when the competition level rose. That was a major concern for me about six weeks ago, but to his credit, he’s been fantastic in conference play, shooting the ball well from three and regaining my confidence in his NBA upside.

One lingering question is how he’ll measure at the NBA Combine. If he comes in at 6’3”, will that impact his draft stock? While we’ve seen smaller, hyper-athletic combo guards like Donovan Mitchell develop into All-Stars, there could be some hesitation depending on his true size. That said, Edgecombe has done a great job easing concerns about his ability to perform against tough opponents, and if his recent play is any indication, he’s back to solidifying himself as a high-level draft prospect.

7. Jeremiah Fears

OklahomaFreshmanGuard6’4” | 180Age on draft night: 18.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 10

Few guards in this class can match Jeremiah Fears’ combination of size and speed—his 6’4” frame and explosive first step give him a natural advantage as a creator. His burst allows him to consistently generate paint touches and get two feet in the lane, which is a critical skill for an NBA point guard. The game is simple—teams need a lead guard who can apply rim pressure, draw two defenders, and make the right read. I think Fears has the size, tools, confidence, and creativity to thrive in that role and have a long NBA career.

Offensively, he has the potential to be dynamic. He has an advanced handle, natural scoring instincts, and the ability to create space for step-back jumpers. He’s also aggressive in attacking the rim, getting to the free-throw line nearly six times per game and converting at a solid clip. Defensively, he’s shown some real flashes as well, averaging just under two steals per game—he has the instincts and quickness to be disruptive on that end of the floor.

The concerns? He needs to improve as a shooter—right now, he’s only hitting 28% from three, which limits his effectiveness as a scorer. He’s also very turnover-prone, averaging four assists to 3.6 turnovers per game, so his decision-making as a playmaker is still a work in progress.

That said, context matters—he’s one of the younger players in this draft class. He’s actually supposed to be in high school and will still be 18 years old on draft night. Among projected first-rounders, only Cooper Flagg, Ace Bailey, Noa Essengue, and Khaman Maluach will also be 18 on draft night. That’s something I have to factor into his evaluation. The tools are there, and if he improves his shooting and decision-making, Fears has the upside to be a long-term NBA lead guard.

8. Kasparas Jakucionis

IllinoisFreshmanCombo Guard6’6” | 205Age on draft night: 19.06

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 7

There’s a lot to like about Kasparas Jakucionis. He has excellent positional size for a lead guard, he’s a high-level passer, and he consistently finds ways to stuff the stat sheet and impact winning. He’s currently averaging 15.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 4.8 assists per game, and despite not being a high-end athlete, he has a knack for getting to the free-throw line, averaging five attempts per game. He plays with confidence, has a strong feel for the game, and does a lot of little things that contribute to winning basketball.

The concerns with Jakucionis start with his turnovers—he’s averaging 3.5 per game, which is high for a primary ball-handler. He’s also a bit of a tough evaluation because, while he isn’t the type of guard who consistently gets two feet in the paint or puts a ton of pressure on the rim, he still manages to draw a lot of fouls. The big question is how he’ll create separation at the NBA level, where defenders will be longer, quicker, and more physical. He’s going to be heavily reliant on screens to get downhill, and his shot selection could use some refining. Nearly half of his field goal attempts come from beyond the arc, and while he’s an excellent shooter off the dribble, he has a heavy diet of contested step-back jumpers. He’s shooting a respectable 35% from three overall, though his percentages have dipped slightly in conference play.

Even with these concerns, Jakucionis has done enough to solidify himself as a top-10 pick. His blend of size, playmaking, and shot-making is highly valuable, and if he can clean up some of the inefficiencies, he has a real chance to be a high-level NBA guard.

9. Noa Essengue

Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)Forward6’9” | 195Age on draft night: 18.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 11

If you’ve been following my last few Big Boards or mock drafts, then you know I’m higher on Noa Essengue than the consensus. I’m really intrigued by his overall production as a teenager playing in a respectable league in Germany. He just figures out ways to impact the game despite being only 18 years old and listed at 6’9”, 185 pounds. To me, he’s a player with loads of potential, and despite his current offensive limitations—his lack of shot creation, a reliable jumper, and a tight handle—he still manages to be productive. That makes me believe that once he puts it all together, you’re looking at a unique player who can make a positive impact on both ends of the floor.

With his length and athleticism, I’ve even had an NBA scout mention that he could be a modern-day Tayshaun Prince defensively. He has the tools to be a versatile, disruptive defender who can guard multiple positions and make winning plays.

The concerns I have with Essengue are similar to what I like about him. While he’s productive, his archetype may give some scouts pause. He’s not a reliable shooter at this point in his career, he’s not a natural shot-maker or creator, and his handle is still a work in progress. He may be stuck between positions, and his thin frame could make it tough for him to hold up physically early in his career. Right now, he doesn’t have the offensive skill set to be a full-time wing in the NBA, but he also doesn’t have the strength to play as a traditional big.

That said, I still think he’s a high-upside pick worth the risk. If a team is patient with his development, they could end up with a versatile, switchable forward who impacts winning in a lot of different ways.

10. Nolan Traore

Saint-Quentin (France)Point Guard6’3” | 175Age on draft night: 19.06

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 9

Nolan Traore has had an up-and-down season playing for Saint-Quentin in France, but he’s still shown glimpses of why he was projected as a top-five pick coming into the year. There were even some evaluators who had him ranked ahead of Dylan Harper as the best point guard prospect in this class. At his best, Traore looks like the dynamic playmaker everyone was so high on after an impressive spring and summer. He turned heads at the Nike Hoop Summit, dominated the Adidas Next Generation Tournament (leading the event in scoring), and then followed that up by leading the FIBA U18 World Cup in assists while representing France. He entered the season with real buzz, but his performance this season in France’s top league has raised some questions.

What makes Traore so intriguing is his physical tools. He has good positional size at 6’4”, plus the speed and first step to absolutely blow by defenders. He doesn’t always need a screen to get into the paint, which is a major plus for an NBA lead guard. He’s also a good passer with flashes of offensive creativity.

The concerns, however, are tough to ignore. His efficiency has been a major issue—he’s shooting just 36% from the field and 27% from three. There were already some concerns about his finishing efficiency, and he’s struggled in the paint as well. His game can also be a bit predictable—when he goes right, he’s attacking the rim, and when he goes left, it’s usually a step-back jumper. He’s also had some high-turnover games, which adds to the inconsistency.

If you strip away his performances from last spring and summer and evaluate him strictly on how he’s played for Saint-Quentin and France this season, it’s tough to justify him as a lottery pick.

However, I try to use context. The transition to playing in a professional league at 18 years old is difficult, and I believe a lot of the freshman guards playing college basketball would struggle in a similar situation.

Overall, Traore is a tough evaluation—his tools and flashes are undeniably enticing, but his efficiency and decision-making leave real questions about his long-term projection.

11. Egor Demin

BYUFreshmanCombo Guard6’9” | 190Age on draft night: 19.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 5

Egor Demin is a potential lottery pick who has scouts enamored with his excellent positional size, court vision, and passing instincts. In my opinion, he’s the best passer and playmaker in this draft class. At 6’9”, he can see over the top of defenses and create passing angles that very few guards can. He’s actually an even better passer than I initially thought—I knew he had strong vision and could run an offense, but he has consistently impressed me with his ability to manipulate defenses and make advanced reads. With his combination of size and playmaking, he’s going to get a strong push for the lottery.

The concerns with Demin start with his shooting, his handle, and questions about his overall toughness. Some scouts have pointed out that in certain games—like the matchup against Houston—he wasn’t assertive, avoiding the paint and struggling against smaller guards who got into his airspace and disrupted him. I have similar concerns. He needs to improve as a shooter and tighten his handle to reach his full potential as a lead initiator.

In all honesty, I think Demin should strongly consider returning to school to refine his game—developing as a shooter and ball-handler would do wonders for his long-term outlook. But when you’re a potential lottery pick, it’s hard to turn down that opportunity. Ultimately, I believe that if he becomes a more aggressive scorer, it will only help unlock his elite passing instincts and allow him to maximize his playmaking ability at the next level.

12. Kon Knueppel

DukeFreshmanWing6’7” | 215Age on draft night: 19.8

Big Board 1.0 Rank: 16

Kon Knueppel is a prospect whose draft stock has fluctuated throughout the season on my personal Big Boards, but at this point, I think his steady play, outside shooting, and connective passing make him a near-lock for the lottery. Knueppel does a lot of things well—he’s competitive, a strong shooter, and a high-IQ player who consistently makes the right pass. All the reports coming out of Duke from scouts indicate that he is 1000% focused on basketball and improving, which should serve him well at the next level.

As for concerns, earlier in the season, I had some doubts about how he performed against high-level competition—there were games where he disappeared. The ACC is down this year, but to his credit, he’s been really strong in conference play and has eased some of my concerns about his ability to step up against top-tier opponents.

Defensively, he may struggle in space at the NBA level, as his lateral quickness isn’t a strength. He also doesn’t have the same level of upside as some of the players projected to go around him.

That said, his all-around game gives him a high floor, and in my opinion, he’s one of the safer picks in this class. Even if he doesn’t become a star, he has the tools, skill set, and mindset to be a productive NBA player for a long time.

13. Asa Newell

GeorgiaFreshmanCenter6’11” | 220Age on draft night: 19.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 17

Asa Newell has firmly established himself as a lottery pick in my eyes. There’s a lot to like about his game, and I see him as a situational 4-5 at the NBA level. At the very least, he should carve out a role as an athletic lob threat and play finisher. He’s one of the better athletes in this class, quick off his feet, and capable of impacting games without needing a high volume of touches. He plays with a great motor, runs the floor hard, and should excel as a transition finisher.

Offensively, Newell has shown flashes of a post game with soft touch finishes and the ability to face up and score. He should be able to make an impact off his activity—whether it’s putbacks, cutting, or effort plays around the rim. He’s also shown promise as a shooter, and while he’s averaging less than one assist per game, I don’t think the numbers fully reflect his passing ability. He makes quick decisions with the ball and has real potential to develop into a strong short-roll playmaker over time. His production in the SEC—15 points, just under seven rebounds, and 2.2 stocks per game—shows that he’s been effective in the best conference in college basketball.

As for concerns, the biggest one is his positional fit. Right now, he’s a bit stuck between the 4 and 5. He doesn’t yet have the strength to be a full-time NBA center, but his current skill set also doesn’t fully translate to being a true 4 at the next level. However, once he adds strength, I could see him developing into a full-time 5. He’s shown some face-up ability and flashes of a jumper, but consistency will be key.

I also have some questions about his rim protection. He’s been playing both the 4 and 5 at Georgia, but even dating back to high school, he shared a frontcourt with Cooper Flagg and Derik Queen, meaning he wasn’t always the primary rim protector. That makes it difficult to fully project what kind of shot-blocker he’ll be at the next level. Despite these concerns, his athleticism, motor, and versatility make him an intriguing long-term prospect with plenty of upside.

14. Derik Queen

MarylandFreshmanPost6’10” | 245Age on draft night: 19.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 12

Derik Queen is having a really strong freshman season at Maryland, and his unique skill set has been on full display. He’s an interior presence who blends strength, finesse, and high-level skill. At 6’10”, he’s one of the most skilled young big men in recent years—he can handle the ball, lead the break, and face up, all while being a force on the glass. His excellent touch and advanced feel for the game make him a tough cover, and his talent was fully on display in his 29-point, 15-rebound, 5-assist performance against Rutgers on Super Bowl Sunday.

The concerns with Queen come down to fit. Despite having a modern offensive skill set, there are some questions about how he scales up in the NBA. While his defensive counting stats look solid, he’s not a natural rim protector. He also doesn’t space the floor—his shot is a bit flat, and while I do think his touch suggests long-term shooting potential, it’s not there yet. That puts him in a tricky spot in terms of role projection.

In today’s NBA, most bigs fall into three categories: athletic lob threats, defensive anchors, or floor spacers. Queen doesn’t quite fit neatly into any of those boxes. He has the skill set to be an offensive hub, but the question is whether an NBA coach will be comfortable featuring him in that role.

The right situation will be key for him—he needs a system that values his passing, skill, and interior scoring without asking him to be something he’s not.

15. Hugo Gonzalez

Real Madrid (Spain)Wing6’6” | 205Age on draft night: 19.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 24

Hugo González presents an interesting dilemma for NBA scouts, as his playing time with Real Madrid has been inconsistent, making it difficult to get a full evaluation of his game. Compared to other prospects in this class, there’s simply less recent film to analyze. However, despite the limited minutes, González has been a highly productive player at the youth level, consistently putting up numbers and contributing to winning for Real Madrid’s junior teams.

He’s a do-it-all wing with strong physical tools, a good athlete who plays with relentless energy and competitiveness. He can pass, defend multiple positions, and brings a level of toughness that NBA teams will appreciate. And while he may not have logged significant minutes this season, he has valuable experience practicing against some of the best players in Europe over the past few years.

The biggest concern outside of his lack of playing time is his shooting. He does a lot of things well, but the most glaring hole in his game is his outside shot. He’s a respectable shooter when given consistent volume and minutes, but he’s not the type of player who can come off the bench cold and immediately knock down looks. He’s the kind of prospect who needs rhythm and opportunity to maximize his impact.

There are times I wish he had chosen the college route or found a situation where he could have played a larger role, because the flashes he’s shown make you want to see more.

That said, González’s strong track record at the youth level in Europe, along with his all-around game and competitive mindset, should still draw plenty of first-round interest.

16. Cedric Coward

Washington StateSeniorWing6’6” | 205Age on draft night: 21.8

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 27

I might be the biggest Cedric Coward fan in the world. Even though his season was cut short after just six games, I still believe he’s worthy of a first-round pick. I had a conversation with an NBA scout last week, and when I mentioned how high I was on Coward, he laughed and said we were on the same page—he had Coward as the No. 3 ranked wing on his personal big board.

There’s a lot to like. He has great positional size, a massive wingspan, and he’s an efficient shooter from deep. Defensively, he’s switchy and versatile—he can guard all over the floor and provide weak-side rim protection. He’s also capable of scoring in the low post, using his length to shoot over smaller defenders, and he plays with a level of efficiency that stands out. He doesn’t waste dribbles, gets to his spots, and at the very least, he fits the highly coveted 3-and-D archetype.

The main concerns with Coward are his ball handling and strength. He showed some improvement as a handler in his limited time at Washington State, but it’s still an area that needs work. Physically, he’ll also need to get stronger to handle the NBA game. From everything I’ve heard, he’s expected to be ready for the NBA Combine, which should give teams a better look at where he stands.

I’m a big believer in Coward, and despite the limited sample size this season, I still have him as a first-round pick in the 2025 NBA Draft.

17. Thomas Sorber

GeorgetownFreshmanCenter6’10” | 255Age on draft night: 19.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Georgetown has a strong tradition of producing NBA big men—from Patrick Ewing to Alonzo Mourning, the late Dikembe Mutombo, Othella Harrington, and Roy Hibbert. Now, Thomas Sorber looks to be next in line. Sorber continues to rise up draft boards, catching people by surprise with his play. He didn’t enter the season with the fanfare of a one-and-done prospect, but he has firmly established himself as not only one of the best freshmen in the country but also one of the top bigs in college basketball.

If you want a game that perfectly encapsulates why scouts are high on Thomas Sorber, his performance against Providence a few weeks ago is the one to watch. The 6'10", 255-pound big man—boasting a reported 7'6" wingspan—put together a dominant all-around showing, finishing with 25 points, 15 rebounds, 3 blocks, 2 assists, and 2 steals. He was highly efficient, shooting 10-of-17 from the field, knocking down 2-of-3 from beyond the arc, and going a perfect 3-of-3 at the free-throw line.

He’s a big-bodied center who blends an old-school interior presence with a modern-day skill set. He can bang in the post, knock down face-up jumpers, and impact the game on the glass. He does a great job establishing low-post position and has the mobility to sprint the floor in transition. While the numbers don’t fully reflect it yet, I think he has real long-term potential as a floor spacer—his touch suggests he could develop into a capable perimeter shooter down the line.

The concerns with Sorber start with his athleticism. He’s somewhat of a below-the-rim finisher, and I think he’ll need to trim down to maximize his mobility and explosiveness. If he can slim down, it could unlock another level of quickness and agility for him, which would help his overall impact on both ends of the floor.

Sorber is an intriguing first-round option for teams looking to add size and frontcourt depth. His combination of physicality, skill, and potential floor-spacing ability makes him a fascinating long-term prospect.

18. Ben Saraf

Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)Guard6’6” | 200Age on draft night: 19.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 19

Ben Saraf has continued to be productive this season in Germany, building off his scorching summer at the FIBA U18 European Championship, where he put up a record-breaking 28 points per game. Now with ratiopharm Ulm, he’s averaging 12.8 points and 4.6 assists while shooting 42% from the field—solid numbers for an 18-year-old playing in a competitive professional league.

Saraf brings plenty to the table—a 6’6” guard who relentlessly pressures the rim and plays with a fiery competitive edge. He has the ability to collapses defenses, shoot the mid range pull up and can make plays for others. That combination—size, ball-handling, and paint penetration—fits a highly valued archetype in today’s NBA.

But there are still real concerns. Saraf is best with the ball in his hands, yet I’m not convinced he’s a full-time lead guard. His decision-making can be questionable, and he’s turnover-prone, which raises concerns about how much responsibility he can shoulder at the next level.

Defensively, I’m not sure he can stay in front of NBA point guards, which could force him into more of an off-ball role.

That circles back to his biggest swing skill—shooting. He’s been inconsistent from deep, particularly off the catch, and if he’s asked to play off the ball more in the NBA, he’ll need to become more reliable.

Still, the production at his age and level of competition, along with his size and ability to create advantages, should make him a first-round pick.

NBA teams value big guards who can break down defenses, and Saraf checks that box.

19. Danny Wolf

MichiganJuniorCenter7’1” | 250Age on draft night: 21.1

Few prospects offer Danny Wolf’s combination of size, skill, and playmaking instincts. At 7 feet, 250 pounds, he racks up double-doubles, but it’s his vision and offensive versatility that make him a unique talent. It’s rare to find a player with his size who can handle the ball, make high-level reads, and facilitate like a guard. I actually had an NBA team reach out to me and say he’s exactly the type of player they’re looking for—someone who can take some of the ball-handling burden off their guards, grab a rebound, push the ball up the floor, and initiate the offense.

The biggest concern with Wolf is that, while his playmaking is his greatest asset, he’s also a turnover machine. He ranks among the nation's leaders in turnovers, and while some of them happen because his teammates aren’t always ready for his passes—he sees everything—others are just flat-out head-scratchers, with the ball ending up in the first row.

Even with those concerns, Wolf’s size, skill, and passing makes him one of the most unique players in this class. He’s a fascinating first-round prospect who could provide real value as a versatile offensive hub at the next level.

20. Liam McNeeley

ConnecticutFreshmanWing6’7” | 210Age on draft night: 19.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 26

After missing over a month of action, Liam McNeeley has come back with a noticeably aggressive approach. In his first two games back against St. John’s and Creighton, he set career highs in field goal attempts, three-point attempts, and getting to the foul line 20 times. His breakout performance came against Creighton, where he dropped a career-high 38 points and 10 rebounds while shooting 12-of-22 from the field, 5-of-10 from deep, and converting 9-of-10 from the line.

McNeeley brings a valuable mix of positional size, outside shooting, rebounding, connective passing, and strong decision-making. To me, he’s one of the safer bets in this draft class, largely because of his shooting —something that will always have a place in the NBA.

The concerns with McNeeley mainly stem from his athletic limitations. He doesn’t have the ideal explosiveness or lateral quickness that teams typically look for in a wing, which could be a challenge on the defensive end. He may struggle to keep quicker players in front of him, and in today’s NBA—where teams actively hunt mismatches in ball screens—he could be the type of player opposing offenses target.

That said, his shooting, passing, IQ, toughness, and competitiveness make him a high-floor prospect. Even if he’s not the most dynamic athlete, his skill set should allow him to be a productive NBA player and a strong complementary piece at the next level.

21. Ian Jackson

North CarolinaFreshmanGuard6’4” | 180Age on draft night: 20.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 23

Ian Jackson’s season can almost be broken up into three distinct parts. Early on, there were plenty of moments where it looked like he deserved more playing time—he was providing a spark to a struggling North Carolina team in limited minutes, and it felt like he was being held back. Then came his breakthrough stretch as a starter, where he reeled off an impressive seven-game run, scoring 20 or more points in six of those contests while helping UNC go 6-1 during that span. But in the last stretch of the season, his efficiency and consistency has fallen off dramatically. His recent cold streak hasn’t taken away from what makes him such a dangerous scorer.

He loves to get downhill, attack the rim, and put pressure on defenses. When he’s hot, he’s one of the better scorers in the country, capable of ripping off efficient 20-point performances. He can create his own shot off the dribble, get to the rim at will, and knock down threes both off the catch and off the dribble. His aggressive approach is what makes him so intriguing as a scoring threat.

The biggest concern with Jackson is his passing—or lack thereof. He’s a pure scorer, but he doesn’t move the ball much at all. He’s averaging just one assist per game for the season, with his best game being a modest three-assist outing. For a 6’4” guard who isn’t a true point guard, that raises questions about his long-term positional fit. If he’s strictly a score-first, shoot-first guard who doesn’t provide much playmaking, the margin for error becomes very small.

That said, his competitiveness, attacking mindset, and ability to put up points in bunches make him an interesting prospect. I think his best path in the NBA is as an instant offense guy off the bench—he’ll need to improve as a passer, but his scoring ability gives him a real chance to carve out a role at the next level.

22. Miles Byrd

San Diego StateSophomoreWing6’7” | 190Age on draft night: 20.8

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Miles Byrd has emerged as one of the top breakout prospects in college basketball, and I believe he has a real shot at being a first-round pick in the 2025 NBA Draft. After playing just four games as a freshman, he redshirted and returned last season, averaging only four points per game. Now, as a redshirt sophomore, he has more than tripled his scoring average and has impressed with his combination of positional size, physical tools, and skill set.

While Byrd isn’t the most efficient scorer, he flashes intriguing offensive potential as a 3-and-D wing who can also make plays with the ball in his hands. He has good court vision and occasionally shows glimpses of on-ball shot creation. However, it’s his defense that has really caught the attention of NBA scouts. Byrd is averaging two steals and one block per game, using his length and mobility to defend all over the floor.

While defense is his calling card, he’s also had big offensive performances—most notably a 25-point, seven-steal, six-rebound game against Colorado State, where he outplayed Nique Clifford, another potential first-round pick. Right now, Byrd feels like he’s just scratching the surface of what he can be on both ends.

The biggest concern is his shooting consistency. While he has stretches where he looks like an efficient shooter, he also goes through cold spells. He started the season fairly strong, but his percentages have dipped to 38% from the field and 31% from three. On the bright side, he’s an excellent free-throw shooter, hitting 83% over the last two years, which suggests he has room to improve as a perimeter threat.

Despite the inconsistencies, I’m intrigued by his passing, athleticism, and overall NBA physical tools. If he can become a more consistent outside shooter, he has all the makings of a first-round talent.

23. Will Riley

IllinoisFreshmanWing6’8” | 180Age on draft night: 19.4

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 15

Will Riley has played his way into strong first-round consideration with his recent performances. He got off to a phenomenal start to the season, scoring 31 points on 10-of-13 shooting in his debut, and while he’s had some ups and downs—which is expected for a freshman—his blend of size, shooting, and passing makes him an intriguing high-upside swing prospect. He has good positional size and a skill set that fits the modern NBA. He can handle the ball, shoot from deep, and is a sneaky-good playmaker out of ball screens.

The concerns with Riley start with his physicality. He has a thin frame and has struggled at times against the physicality of the college game. He’s also not a high-level athlete, which raises questions about whether he’ll be able to create separation or consistently get by defenders at the NBA level. His lack of explosiveness could limit his ability to be an on-ball creator.

That said, Riley’s promise as a shooter and his ability to make plays out of the pick-and-roll should be enough for a team to take a chance on him in the first round. However, whoever drafts him will need to be patient—he’ll need time to develop his body before he’s ready to compete at the NBA level.

24. Kam Jones

MarquetteSeniorWing6’5” | 200Age on draft night: 23.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 22

Kam Jones continues to impress this season with his scoring and playmaking. Coming into the year, we already knew he could score—he was seventh in the Big East in scoring last season and the leading scorer on a Marquette team that had two players drafted in 2024. But the biggest revelation in his game has been his playmaking. He’s averaging 5.9 assists per game, nearly tripling his assist totals from last year, and he’s doing it efficiently, boasting a 3.5-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio. A 6’5” playmaker who can handle the ball, make sound decisions, and score at all three levels is a first-round pick in any draft, in my opinion.

I see Jones as an NBA-ready wing and a plug-and-play prospect—someone who can step in and contribute right away for a team in need of backcourt scoring and playmaking.

The concerns with Jones start with his age—he’ll be 23 on draft night, making him one of the older prospects in this class. His three-point shooting has also taken a noticeable dip. After shooting 40% from three as a junior, he’s down to just 31% this season, and his free-throw percentage has also dropped to 67%. That’s a significant contrast from last season and raises some questions about his long-term shooting consistency.

Even with those concerns, I still believe Jones is worthy of a first-round pick. His ability to create offense for himself and others, combined with his size and decision-making, makes him a strong option for teams looking for an immediate contributor.

25. Collin Murray-Boyles

South CarolinaSophomoreForward6’7” | 230Age on draft night: 20.03

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Collin Murray-Boyles is a tricky player to evaluate, but his talent is impossible to ignore. At the college level, he stands out as one of the most unique prospects in the country.

He’s an exceptional finisher around the rim, highly intelligent on both ends, a gifted passer, and a relentless presence on the glass and defensively. His skill set is built on a rare blend of strength, power, finesse, touch, and ball-handling ability—traits you don’t typically see in a player his size.

In the post, he’s often too strong for smaller defenders to handle, but it’s his skill that truly separates him. His ability to put the ball on the floor and attack off the dribble makes him a tough matchup for bigger defenders. He plays through contact, moves well without the ball, and consistently finds openings in the defense. Whether facing up, attacking off the bounce, or finishing around the rim, he brings a level of versatility and mobility that makes him a difficult cover at the college level.

One of the most underrated aspects of his game is his passing. The stats don’t fully capture how advanced his court vision is. He makes high-level reads out of short rolls, finds shooters, and consistently hits cutters against double teams. He’s simply one of the more unique prospects in recent memory. But with that uniqueness comes a tough evaluation, as his size and style of play don’t fit neatly into a traditional NBA role.

My concerns with Murray-Boyles are pretty straightforward. He’s an undersized big at 6’7” who doesn’t space the floor. His outside shooting is a real question mark, and while he’s an okay free-throw shooter, he hasn’t shown much range beyond that. In today’s NBA, where floor spacing is highly valued, that raises concerns about his fit. He could potentially carve out a role as a small-ball center, but even then, he’d be significantly undersized for the position.

There’s also the reality of South Carolina’s struggles this season. It’s not his fault, but the team has been a major disappointment in SEC play after a strong season last year. They’re winless in conference play, and if I’m nitpicking, I have to wonder how much of what he brings to the table translates to winning at the next level.

That said, while I may be a bit lower on Murray-Boyles than the consensus, I still believe he’s absolutely worth a first-round pick. His skill set, toughness, and versatility make him a fascinating long-term prospect.

26. Maxime Raynaud

StanfordSeniorCenter7’1” | 250Age on draft night: 22.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 28

Statistically, Maxime Raynaud is one of the most productive big men in the country—if not the most. On paper, his numbers are impressive, and there’s a lot to like about his game. At 7’1”, he has NBA positional size and a versatile skill set that allows him to impact the game both inside and out. He’s a floor-spacing big, capable of stepping out and hitting threes as a pick-and-pop threat, while also showing flashes of putting the ball on the floor and making plays on the move. Around the basket, he has soft touch and is a willing passer, adding to his offensive appeal.

The concerns? Despite averaging 19.9 PPG and 11.2 RPG, his efficiency has dipped in conference play, and he’s currently in a shooting slump. A lot of that stems from the heavy workload he carries for a surprisingly competitive Stanford team in their first ACC season.

I’d also like to see him play with more physicality in the paint. At times, he leans too much on finesse and skill rather than using his size advantage to impose his will. Additionally, his rim protection is a question mark. Some have drawn comparisons to a modern-day Brook Lopez, which makes sense offensively, but defensively, he doesn’t provide the same level of shot-blocking or interior presence, even when factoring in Lopez’s advanced age.

If he can add more physicality and improve as a rim protector, Raynaud has the tools to carve out a real role in the NBA as a skilled, floor-spacing big.

27. Rasheer Fleming

St. Joseph’sJuniorForward-Center6’9” | 230Age on draft night: 20.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 25

In my eyes, Rasheer Fleming continues to hold a first-round grade based on his improvements and production as a junior. He impacts the game in a variety of ways and brings modern NBA tools to the frontcourt. At 6’9” with a reported 7’3” wingspan, he’s a mobile, agile, and coordinated big with a strong frame and good blend of strength and athleticism.

One of the biggest strides in his game this season has been his floor spacing—he’s shooting 43% from three in conference play, adding another layer to his offensive versatility. He’s also an effective finisher around the rim, a strong screener and roll man, and has soft touch with both hands. His ability to impact the game inside and outmakes him an intriguing fit for teams looking for frontcourt depth and a two-way presence.

The biggest concern? He has the tools and talent to dominate, but does he have the mentality to take over games? With his skill set, I keep asking myself—why isn’t he putting up 20 and 10? At the very least, his production should be closer to what DaRon Holmes put up last year at Dayton.

Ultimately, his game scales up well to the NBA—he has size, mobility, shooting, and rim protection. If he develops a more assertive mindset, his upside could be even greater.

28. Joan Beringer

KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana (Slovenia)Center6’11” | 200Age on draft night: 18.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Joan Beringer has climbed into the first-round conversation thanks to his upside and promising play this season. Athleticism is his calling card—he’s a bouncy vertical threat with a clearly defined role as a lob finisher and dunker spot big. He’s an active, high-energy player who provides rebounding, and has the mobility and lateral quickness to defend in space. His raw physical tools alone make him an intriguing first-round prospect.

The concerns? He’s still very raw. Beringer is fairly new to basketball and has a limited offensive game—right now, he’s almost entirely restricted to scoring around the rim. He doesn’t space the floor, handle the ball, or create his own shot. His thin frame will also need to fill out to handle NBA physicality.

Like Asa Newell, he’s a bit stuck between the 4 and 5—he’s not big or strong enough to be a full-time center yet, but he also doesn’t have the perimeter skill set to thrive as a modern 4.

Despite those concerns, his athleticism, defensive potential, and rim-finishing ability give him real NBA upside. If he adds strength and refines his offensive game, he has the tools to be an impact player.

29. JT Toppin

Texas TechSophomorePost6’9”| 210Age on draft night: 21.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 29

J.T. Toppin has been on an absolute tear over the last month, putting up career-best performances on back-to-back nights in mid February. He dropped 41 points, 15 rebounds, 3 blocks, and 2 steals against Arizona State, then followed it up with 32 points, 12 rebounds, 3 blocks, and a steal against Oklahoma State. After testing the NBA Draft waters last year, he returned as a sophomore and transferred to Texas Tech, where he’s taken his game to another level.

Toppin is a high-flying, explosive athlete with NBA vertical pop. He’s quick off his feet, plays with a relentless motor, and excels as a play finisher, transition rim-runner, and rim protector. While he thrives as a finisher, he’s also shown touch around the basket on non-dunk finishes. His rebounding, energy, and defensive presence make him a force in the paint.

The main concern? His true size. Most NBA scouts I’ve spoken to don’t believe he’s 6’9”, and if he measures closer to 6’7” at the NBA Combine, he may be seen as undersized for a full-time 4 or 5. His draft stock could hinge on those measurements, but with his athleticism, motor, and flashes of floor-spacing, there’s a clear NBA role for him.

From a production standpoint, he’s absolutely a first-rounder—but where he lands will depend on how teams view his positional fit and measurements.

30. Isaiah Evans

DukeFreshmanWing6’6” | 175Age on draft night: 19.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Isaiah Evans has played his way into the first-round conversation with his recent performances, particularly in Duke’s wins over Virginia and Illinois. In those two games, he posted 17 points in each, shooting a red-hot 8-of-11 from threeand 11-of-15 from the field overall. Coming into the season, Evans was already known as a gifted scorer, having been one of North Carolina’s most decorated high school offensive talents. However, he found himself buried in Duke’s rotation behind potential lottery pick Kon Knueppel, which limited his minutes early in the season.

What makes Evans such an intriguing NBA prospect is that he’s producing at a high level despite limited playing time. For example, in Duke’s matchup against Auburn, he exploded for 18 points in just 16 minutes, making 6-of-8 from three. Even after that performance, his playing time continued to fluctuate, and he has logged more than 20 minutes in a game just three times this season. Despite the inconsistent role, his elite shooting has remained a constant—Evans is shooting 45.8% from three on four attempts per game in only 13 minutes per contest. His ability to catch fire quickly and provide instant offense makes him a potential microwave scorer at the next level, which will appeal to NBA teams looking for floor spacers.

The main concern with Evans—and likely one of the reasons he has struggled to earn consistent minutes—is his thin frame. He’s listed at 6’6”, 175 pounds, and his lack of strength raises questions about his ability to defend at the next level. Additionally, his limited playing time has made it difficult to evaluate the other aspects of his game. Outside of his elite shooting, it’s unclear how much he can contribute in other areas—can he make plays as a defender? Is he a capable secondary playmaker? Can he create his own offense off the dribble? Those questions remain unanswered. However, his shooting ability alone is enough to put him firmly in first-round discussions, especially considering how productive he has been on one of the most talented teams in the country.

31. Adou Thiero

ArkansasJuniorForward6’8” | 220Age on draft night: 21.1

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 20

Adou Thiero continues to shine for Arkansas and cements himself as one of the most improved players in the country. One of the things I love about his game is how much he’s developed year over year. If you compare where he was as a freshman to where he is now, it’s easy to envision him continuing to expand his skill set and make further strides.

Thiero is a high-energy player who impacts the game with his motor, effort, and ability to slash to the rim. His potential as a switchable, athletic defender and transition finisher makes him an intriguing option for NBA teams looking for wing depth. He plays with energy, and his ability to get downhill and finish through contact adds real value to his game.

The biggest concern, without a doubt, is his shooting. To be totally honest, he’s just not a good shooter at this stage. He’s hitting only 26% from three this season on low volume, and over his career, he’s at just 29% from deep. He rarely looks to shoot from the outside, often passing up open looks in favor of attacking the paint.

If he can develop into even a respectable, league-average shooter, it would open up his entire game and allow him to maximize his potential. With his defensive versatility, energy, and ability to get to the rim, he has the tools to carve out a long NBA career.

But ultimately, his success at the next level will depend on how much he improves as a shooter—and how soon he can earn the trust of an NBA coach despite that glaring weakness.

32. Nique Clifford

Colorado StateSeniorWing6’6” | 190Age on draft night: 23.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 30

The main appeal of Nique Clifford is that he’s a do-it-all wing who contributes in a variety of ways. At 6’6”, he is arguably the best rebounding wing in this draft class, averaging 10 rebounds per game while also putting up 17.9 points and 4.1 assists per game. Despite being a fifth-year senior, his versatility and ability to leave his finger prints on the game across multiple areas make him a top 30 prospect.

Clifford can attack the rim, create opportunities for teammates, and keep the offense flowing as a smart, connective passer. His shooting has been solid, as he’s knocking down 36% from three this season, slightly down from 37% last year. The dip in percentage likely comes from an increased shot volume, rather than a regression in skill.

Another positive development this season has been his increased aggression in attacking the rim—his free throw attempts have jumped from 2.3 last season to 4.5 per game this year, which is a promising sign for his offensive growth. More than anything, Clifford is the type of player who fits into any system, providing a Swiss Army knife skill set that allows him to contribute without needing the ball in his hands.

There aren’t many glaring concerns with Clifford, but his shooting consistency could be a deciding factor in his NBA role. If he’s going to fill a 3-and-D role, he may need to become a more efficient shooter from deep. While I believe his shooting is good enough, his NBA success will likely depend on how reliably he can knock down threes at the next level.

33. Labaron Philon

AlabamaFreshmanPoint Guard6’4” | 175Age on draft night: 19.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 14

Labaron Philon is a player who could have a wide draft range in 2025. On some nights, he looks like a lottery pick thanks to his size, playmaking, and intangibles. On other nights, he looks like a freshman still adjusting to the college game.

What makes Philon such an intriguing prospect is his shiftiness as a ball handler, his ability to push the pace, and the energy and competitive fire he brings to the floor. He’s an unselfish playmaker who knows how to get into the paint, draw fouls, and create for others. He operates well out of the pick-and-roll, showing the ability to find lob threats and kick out to open shooters.

The concerns for Philon center around his struggles in conference play. He’s shooting just 37% from the field and 30% from three, and finishing at the rim has been an issue. Turnovers can also be a problem, but the biggest red flag is his outside shooting, as he’s hitting just 28% from deep.

That said, context matters. If he were at a different school with a larger offensive role, his numbers and impact might look even better. Despite his inconsistencies, he has exceeded expectations and has been a key part of Alabama’s success this season. His draft stock will ultimately depend on how well he finishes the year, but his playmaking, size, and competitiveness give him clear NBA upside.

34. Sergio De Larrea

Valencia Basket (Spain)Guard6’6” | 175Age on draft night: 19.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Spanish guard Sergio De Larrea has been a prospect I’ve tracked closely since first seeing him at the Adidas Next Generation Tournament in Belgrade in 2022, and he continues to intrigue me. He’s having a strong season in Spain, and there’s a lot to like about his game.

De Larrea has excellent positional size for a lead guard at 6’6” and possesses advanced court vision and passing instincts. He’s a creative, flashy playmaker who thrives on live-dribble reads, consistently passing teammates open and delivering the ball from a variety of angles—overhead, hook passes, pocket passes, and skip passes. He plays with great pace and patience, never gets sped up, and processes the game quickly, making him one of the most entertaining passers in this class.

The concerns? His shooting has been streaky in the past, though he’s knocking down threes at a high clip this season. Finishing at the rim remains a weakness, and there are questions about whether he can defend high-level NBA guards. He’s also had inconsistent performances on the international stage, particularly while representing Spain at the FIBA U20 World Cup, where he struggled to stand out.

Still, his combination of size, vision, and creativity makes him an appealing prospect, especially if his shooting and defense continue to develop.

35. Dink Pate

Mexico City CapitanesGuard6’8” | 210Age on draft night: 19.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 21

Dink Pate continues to be one of the more polarizing prospects in the 2025 NBA Draft class. He’s made noticeable improvements from last year, when he played as a 17-year-old for the G League Ignite, but questions still remain about his long-term fit. The main attraction with Pate is his size—at 6’8”, he has a unique blend of skill, court vision, and athleticism. Last season, there were encouraging flashes of him as a passer, and there was some hope that he could develop into a player teams trust to make decisions with the ball in his hands. Jumbo playmakers who can make high-level reads are always in demand and Pate fit the archetype. Pate has also shown real improvement as a shooter this year after struggling adjusting to the NBA line last season.

The concerns with Pate start with his role and positional fit. With the Mexico City Capitanes, he’s playing a different role than he did with Ignite, and the playmaking flashes he showed last year have been far less frequent. He seems to be more focused on scoring, and some scouts have raised concerns about how quickly he processes the game. If he doesn’t process the floor fast enough, that severely limits his upside as a point forward.

So the big question remains—what is his natural position? He’s probably at his best with the ball in his hands, but does an NBA team believe he’s a good enough decision-maker to trust him with heavy on-ball reps? If not, does he bring enough off the ball to warrant a high investment? Those are the questions that make Pate such a difficult evaluation, despite his clear upside.

36. Hunter Sallis

Wake ForestSeniorWing6’5” | 185Age on draft night: 22.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Hunter Sallis returned to Wake Forest for his senior season to boost his draft stock, and only time will tell if the decision will pay off in terms of impressing NBA scouts enough to earn a first-round grade. He is a three-level scorer capable of efficient, high-scoring outbursts, which he has proven multiple times this season. He dropped 30 points on 12-17 shooting against Stanford, put up 24 points on 10-17 shooting against Virginia Tech, and scored 26 points on 11-15 shooting against Clemson.

He’s at his best in the mid-range, where he favors his pull-up jumper, and he complements it with a knack for drawing fouls, averaging 4.5 free-throw attempts per game. While he initially returned for his senior season with hopes of getting more on-ball reps, he has ultimately settled back into the same role he played last year.

One of the main concerns with Sallis is his frame. While he has added strength throughout his college career, he’s still thin for an NBA wing at 6’5”, 185 pounds, which could be an issue against stronger, more physical defenders at the next level. Another question is his outside shooting.

Last season, he connected on 40% of his three-point attempts, but this year that number has dropped to 29%, and if the season ended today, he would have three college seasons shooting below 30% from deep.

That inconsistency raises concerns about his ability to thrive in an off-ball role, which will likely be his position in the NBA. While he is probably at his best with the ball in his hands, he isn’t a traditional point guard, and it’s unlikely he’ll be given the opportunity to run an offense at the next level.

That means he’ll need to become a more reliable shooter to maximize his NBA potential. If he can get hot from three down the stretch, it would go a long way toward boosting his draft stock and solidifying his role as an off-ball scorer at the next level.

37. Noah Penda

LeMans (France)Wing6’8” | 225Age on draft night: 20.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Noah Penda is a player who has really grown on me over the last few months, largely due to the improvements he’s made as a shooter. He struggled with his shot at the FIBA U19 World Cup, which initially made me hesitant about his long-term upside. But this season, he’s addressed many of those concerns.

Coming into the year, I viewed him more as a 4-3 hybrid, as he seemed most comfortable operating out of the low post, impacting the game as a cutter, post scorer, and ball mover. However, with his role at Le Mans, he’s spending more time on the perimeter and has been knocking down open shots consistently. He’s shooting 37% on catch-and-shoot threes, which, along with his ability to play both forward spots, make the right reads as a passer, and serve as a connective playmaker, makes him an intriguing prospect.

He’s also a sneaky-good athlete. His frame might not scream explosiveness, but he has a good first step, good agility, and mobility. While he isn’t an elite vertical athlete, he does possess some burst and can take advantage of slower-footed defenders in certain matchups.

The main concerns with Penda start with his finishing at the rim. He’s converting just 55% of his layups, which is a bit low for a player who spends time inside. Improving his touch and consistency around the basket will be key for his development. Additionally, there’s the positional question—is he stuck between the three and the four, or does his versatility allow him to thrive in multiple roles? If it’s the latter, he could become a valuable rotation player who fits well in situational matchups at the next level.

38. Michael Ruzic

Joventut BadalonaForward6’10” | 220Age on draft night: 18.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Michael Ruzic is all about upside. At 6’11”, he has the positional size, agility, and coordination that fit the mold of a modern NBA big who can score inside and out. On the youth levels, he showed efficiency as a finisher around the rim, using soft-touch floaters in the paint and showing a knack for finding gaps in the defense as an intuitive off-ball cutter. He’s also capable of running the floor in transition and has even flashed the handle to push the ball in the open court.

What has scouts enticed with Runic is his potential as a stretch big. He projects as a pick-and-pop threat who can attack closeouts and make smart reads on the move, making him a high-upside offensive piece if his development stays on track.

However, there are several concerns. He is very thin and will need to bulk up to handle NBA physicality. At just 18 years old on draft night, he has plenty of room to grow, but he’s also a long way from contributing at the NBA level. Despite being mobile and coordinated, he’s not an explosive vertical athlete and is more of a below-the-rim finisher, which raises questions about his ability to score efficiently in traffic.

Another issue is the limited sample size—he has missed significant time with an injury and has been limited to just 14 games this season. Even when he has played, he hasn’t been assertive or aggressive, averaging just four points per game. The outside shooting, which was expected to be a strength, has struggled as well—he’s shooting just 31% from three and 37% from the free-throw line.

Given his age, frame, and raw skill set, Ruzic looks like a draft-and-stash candidate who will need time to develop before being ready for NBA minutes.

39. Donnie Freeman

SyracuseFreshmanForward6’10” | 215Age on draft night: 19.8

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

I’m a big, big fan of Donnie Freeman, and it’s unfortunate that his freshman season was cut short due to a lower right leg injury. I thought he had a solid first year, but it was somewhat overshadowed by Syracuse’s struggles.

What I like about Freeman is his positional size at 6’9” and his natural talent—he’s one of the more gifted prospects in this class. He’s long, athletic, and a bouncy finisher around the rim. He’s also mobile, coordinated, and capable of attacking closeouts. Over time, I believe he will develop into a consistent three-point shooter, as he’s already shown flashes of being able to shoot off the dribble. He has the versatility to play both forward spots, and once he adds strength, I think he’ll also be able to score in the low post due to his soft touch around the rim. His length and mobility give him the potential to defend multiple positions, and in high school, he showed flashes as a ball mover and passer. He also projects as a pick-and-pop threat who can push the ball in transition after securing rebounds, making him an ideal modern combo forward.

The biggest concern is the injury itself and how it may impact his decision to enter the 2025 NBA Draft. Beyond that, he’ll need to add strength, as he was listed at 215 pounds coming into the season and struggled with physicality. Another question mark is his defensive impact—despite having the tools to be a good defender, his defensive stats were underwhelming, totaling just five blocks and five steals all season. He also posted a negative assist-to-turnover ratio, which raises some concerns about his decision-making.

That said, I fully buy into his upside as a shooter and believe in his talent. His injury could push him into the second round, but I think whichever team takes him will be getting a first-round talent who could end up being a steal—possibly even on a two-way deal.

40. Drake Powell

North CarolinaFreshmanWing6’5” | 185Age on draft night: 19.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 13

Drake Powell is one of the more intriguing prospects to monitor the remainder of the season. While many scouts believe he will declare for the draft, the big question remains—has he done enough to secure a first-round spot?

There’s plenty to like about Powell, especially on the defensive end, where he is regarded as one of the better defenders in this class. Unfortunately, he’s been playing out of position at North Carolina, a team that lacks size and frontcourt depth. At 6’6”, he’s been forced into roles that don’t fully maximize his skill set, making his evaluation more complicated.

Beyond his defense, I actually think Powell is a much better offensive player than he’s been able to show. Watching his high school film, he stood out as a skilled isolation scorer and one of the more creative shot-makers in this class. He showcased a scoring package built on athleticism, craftiness, and shot-making versatility, but we haven’t seen much of that this season.

However, what we have seen is efficiency. Powell is shooting 48% from the floor and 37% from three, showing he can score within a role when given the opportunity. He’s also had some standout performances that highlight his potential—like his 17-point game against SMU (4-of-6 from three) or his 18-point performance against Michigan State (7-of-9 FG, 4-of-6 from three). The problem? Those games have been rare. Throughout January, he had only one game in double figures, making it difficult to get a true read on his offensive impact.

Powell presents an interesting dilemma for NBA teams. On one hand, you have to acknowledge that he’s playing out of position and North Carolina might not have been the best fit for him. On the other hand, you have to weigh his offensive flashes and defensive upside against his lack of consistent production. His draft range is wide, and whether or not he lands in the first round will ultimately come down to how NBA teams view his long-term potential.

41. Boogie Fland

ArkansasFreshmanCombo Guard6’2” | 175Age on draft night: 18.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: 18

Boogie Fland presents a fascinating dilemma for NBA scouts. His freshman season is officially over after suffering a hand injury against Florida in January, leaving teams to evaluate him based on limited film in SEC play. For most of the season, I viewed Fland as a first-round pick, and while he was playing out of position on a poorly constructed Arkansas team, he still managed to be productive, averaging 15.0 points and 5.7 assists per game while shooting 36% from three on five attempts per game.

The biggest concerns with Fland revolve around efficiency. He really struggled in conference play, shooting just 28% from the field and 27% from three in his five SEC games. He didn’t put much pressure on the rim, which raised questions about his impact if his shot isn’t falling. If there’s a silver lining, it’s that he took great care of the ball—he averaged 4.6 assists per game with less than one turnover per contest and only committed five turnovers in conference play, with three of them coming in one game.

His shooting struggles were evident even before the injury, going 10-for-35 in the Tennessee and Ole Miss games. After injuring his hand against Florida, he played two more games, shooting a combined 8-for-30 from the field, which clearly suggests the injury had an impact on his performance.

Another concern is his size. Listed at 6’2”, 175 pounds, there are questions about how well he’ll finish at the rim and how he’ll hold up defensively against bigger, stronger guards. However, his greatest skill set is his outside shooting and his ability to play both on and off the ball. If he can prove that his shooting struggles were more situational than long-term concerns, he’ll remain a strong candidate for the first round.

42. Jase Richardson

Michigan StateFreshmanCombo Guard6’3” | 185Age on draft night: 18.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Jase Richardson has been one of the biggest surprises from this freshman class. Coming into the season, he didn’t have the typical one-and-done buzz, which isn’t unexpected for a Michigan State program that hasn’t produced a one-and-done prospect since Jaren Jackson Jr. in 2018. But now, there’s a real possibility this could be his only season in East Lansing.

What stands out most is his efficiency—he’s been one of the most efficient players in the country and an analytics darling. Through 26 games, he’s shooting 53% from the floor, 40% from three, and 87% from the foul line. Digging deeper, he’s converting 72% at the rim, thanks to excellent touch and an elite floater that is nearly automatic.

Richardson is also a high-IQ player who makes smart decisions, rarely forces bad shots, and plays off the ball. He can knock down shots, attack closeouts, and has been effective in a complementary role.

The concerns? His NBA role is a bit of a mystery. At 6’3”, 185 pounds, he’s on the smaller side for an off-ball guard. He hasn’t had many opportunities to run an offense, as he’s mostly played off the ball at Michigan State. That raises the question: Does he have more to his game than he’s been able to show? Is Michigan State holding him back? Some teams may want to see him play more point guard, while others may be hesitant about a 6’3” combo guard who, despite being a good athlete, doesn’t have elite burst or bounce.

One stat that adds to the uncertainty: Over his last three games, despite playing over 30 minutes per game in an expanded role, he’s totaled just one assist.

Overall, Jase Richardson is a tough evaluation. You can’t deny his efficiency, but there are still questions about his true role at the next level and whether he has more to his game than he’s shown so far.

43. Alex Condon

FloridaSophomoreBig6’11” | 230Age on draft night: 20.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Alex Condon has taken a major leap in his sophomore season, building on the flashes of promise he showed as a freshman and solidifying himself as a bonafide first-round candidate. At 6’11”, he possesses good positional size and a well-rounded skill set that allows him to contribute in a variety of ways.

Like many Australian prospects, Condon is a highly skilled, fundamentally sound big with good passing instincts. He can dribble, shoot in flashes, and facilitate as a connective passer. The intrigue with Condon lies in his mobility, versatility, and ability to make plays off the dribble at his size. He’s comfortable attacking out of DHOs, scoring in the paint, and finishing around the rim with both hands. His go-to jump hook is effective, and he’s a high-energy player who makes hustle plays, runs the floor, and provides value as a rebounder and rim protector.

One of his most enticing traits is his passing—he processes the game quickly, makes drive-and-kick reads, finds cutters from the high post, and excels at touch passes and quick decisions.

The concerns? He’s a good athlete but lacks elite vertical explosiveness, which could limit him as a lob target or dunker spot finisher. While he’s shown potential as a floor spacer, he’s still developing into a consistent shooter.

Overall, Condon’s appeal comes from his combination of size, skill, motor, passing, rebounding, and defensive presence. If his jumper continues to develop, he has a clear pathway to carving out a role at the next level.

44. Alex Karaban

UConnJuniorForward6’8” | 220Age on draft night: 22.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Alex Karaban has been on NBA radars for the past three seasons, primarily due to his elite three-point shooting. A career 37% shooter from deep over 100+ games with two national championships on his résumé, he has proven himself as one of the most reliable floor spacers in this draft class. However, his game extends beyond just shooting—he’s a sneaky-good athlete, plays with competitive fire, and has the ability to exploit mismatches in the post at the college level. Defensively, he’s also a better shot blocker than you’d expect from a wing, adding an underrated dimension to his impact.

The concerns with Karaban start with shot creation. This was a question mark coming into the season, and while I think it’ll be less of an issue in the NBA, it has affected his efficiency this year. UConn doesn’t have the same level of shot creators and playmakers as in past seasons, making it harder for him to get quality looks, and his shooting percentages have dipped to career lows—43% from the field and 34% from three. That’s a drop from 40% from deep as a freshman and 38% as a sophomore.

Still, I believe his NBA role will be much simpler—he’ll be a three-point specialist, not someone who needs to create his own looks. When his feet are set, he’s one of the best shooters in this class, and in a reduced role as a floor spacer, he should thrive.

Another question is his lateral quickness on defense. While I think he’s an underrated athlete, he may lack the foot speed to stay in front of quicker NBA wings, which could lead to struggles against more athletic perimeter players. That said, he has been a surprisingly effective rim protector at the college level, though it remains to be seen how well that skill will translate to the next level.

Overall, while I’ve been a bit lower on Karaban than the consensus, I still value what he brings to the table—elite shooting, toughness, and the ability to stretch the floor, which will always hold value in today’s NBA.

45. Yaxel Lendeborg

Alabama-BirminghamSeniorForward6’9” | 240Age on draft night: 22.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Yaxel Lendeborg is having a phenomenal season, putting up 17.9 points, 10.8 rebounds, and 4.2 assists per game through 25 games. His production has been even better in AAC conference play, where he's averaging 19 points, 12 rebounds, 5 assists, 2.4 blocks, and 1.6 steals per game while shooting 56% from the floor.

He checks a lot of boxes—he’s a good athlete, tough, and physical, finishes through contact, plays with a high motor, and makes hustle plays by crashing the offensive glass. His game could scale up to the NBA as an energy big off the bench, someone who can finish around the rim, provide rim protection, and play sound defense. There’s also some potential for him to be an occasional floor spacer, but his primary role would likely be as a defensive-minded play finisher.

The concerns with Lendeborg start with his age—he’ll be 22 on draft night, which may raise questions about his long-term upside. I also spoke with an NBA scout who isn’t as high on him, citing that despite the impressive numbers, Lendeborg has struggled against better competition. He pointed to UAB’s game against Memphis, where Lendeborg had 14 points on 5-of-15 shooting, as an example of him feasting on weaker opponents.

While that criticism is debatable, I still believe Lendeborg can find an NBA role. His energy, rebounding, and defensive presence make him a strong option for teams in need of frontcourt depth, and his ability to impact the game without needing plays run for him could help him carve out a niche at the next level.

46. JoJo Tugler

HoustonSophomoreForward/Center6’8” | 230Age on draft night: 20.1

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Jojo Tugler is a compelling prospect thanks to his athleticism, relentless motor, and massive reported 7’6” wingspan. His defensive versatility is the main attraction, as his elite length, lateral mobility, and athleticism allow him to be a switchable, multi-positional defender. He’s already making an impact on that end, averaging 2.1 blocks per game, which further highlights his rim protection upside.

However, the concerns with Tugler are significant, particularly on the offensive end. He is very raw and limited as a scorer, functioning almost exclusively as a play finisher. Despite his incredible wingspan and athleticism, he’s undersized for a true big at 6’8” and doesn’t provide much as a scoring threat—averaging just 5.8 points per game in 22 minutes for Houston. His offensive limitations are reflected in his efficiency; while he thrives as a lob target, he struggles with non-dunk finishes, shooting just 44% on layups when you take away his dunks. For a 6’8” big, that’s a major concern.

Another area of concern is his fouling—he’s averaging three fouls per game in limited minutes, which impacts his ability to stay on the floor. His shooting touch is also a major question mark—he has connected 3-of-9 threes this season (a very small sample) and is a poor free-throw shooter, converting just 51% from the line over two seasons.

Despite these offensive concerns, Tugler’s physical tools, defensive upside, and rim protection make him a worthy upside swing. His motor, switchability, and ability to defend multiple positions give him a clear pathway to carving out an NBA role, even if his offensive game is a long-term project.

47. Johni Broome

AuburnSeniorCenter6’10” | 240Age on draft night: 22.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Broome’s production is undeniable—he’s averaging 18.6 points, nearly 11 rebounds, 3.4 assists, and 2.6 blocks per game while playing a key role for the No. 1 team in the country. He’s also performed well in big games, solidifying himself as one of the most dominant two-way presences in college basketball.

He impacts the game with his physicality, skill set, and defensive presence. He controls the glass on both ends, scores effectively in the paint, and does the little things—setting hard screens, protecting the rim, and playing with toughness. While his three-point shooting numbers don’t stand out, he’s shown some capability as a floor spacer, though it’s an area he’ll need to continue improving to solidify his NBA role.

However, he’s a divisive prospect, as there are concerns about how his game translates to the NBA and the fact that he’ll be 22 on draft night and 23 when the season starts

The biggest concerns revolve around how his game scales to the modern NBA. Today’s centers are typically asked to anchor the defense, be a vertical lob target, or space the floor, and Broome doesn’t firmly fit into any of those categories. The NBA is also a faster-paced league, and bigs are expected to defend in space—an area where he could be tested. While he’s a dominant force at the college level, his lack of elite lateral mobility and outside shooting raises questions about how he’ll be utilized at the next level.

If this were 2005, Broome would be a lock for the first round—but in today’s NBA, where bigs are expected to be more switchable or stretch the floor, he may end up as a second-rounder despite his resume and high-level production.

48. Tahaad Pettiford

AuburnFreshmanGuard6’1” | 175Age on draft night: 19.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

I actually think it’s pretty crazy that Tahaad Pettiford isn’t getting more NBA Draft love from the consensus. He’s a freshman thriving in the SEC, playing a key role for the No. 1 ranked team in the country, and yet he still feels underrated in draft discussions. Pettiford is averaging 12 points per game in conference play, but beyond the numbers, he just has a knack for stepping up in big moments and consistently performing when it matters most.

A prime example of this was when Johni Broome—one of the top Player of the Year candidates—was out, and it was Pettiford who stepped up to keep Auburn afloat. Another moment that showcased his knack to rise to the occasion was when he dropped 21 points on 7-of-12 shooting (5-of-8 from three) with zero turnovers in a road win over No. 4 Houston earlier this season.

What I like most about Pettiford is that he’s a shifty, creative ball handler who knows how to create space off the dribble. He’s also an excellent shooter when his feet are set, making him a valuable offensive weapon despite his size.

However, the concerns are pretty obvious. The NBA is very tough on small guards, and it’s difficult for them to stick in the league unless they’re truly elite—Trae Young-level elite. At 6’1”, 175 pounds, Pettiford has an uphill battle in that regard.

The interesting debate is how Pettiford compares to Boogie Fland, who is widely viewed as the better prospect. According to measurements, Pettiford isn’t much smaller, and while Fland’s assist numbers are higher, you could argue that Pettiford is the better scorer, the more efficient player, and is producing on a much better team.

Now, Pettiford faces an interesting decision—does he enter the draft now, or return to Auburn, where he’d have a much bigger role next season with more playmaking responsibilities? Either way, he has something you can’t teach—a gift for stepping up in big games, along with high-level shooting ability, which makes him a prospect worth monitoring despite his size.

49. Carter Bryant

ArizonaFreshmanWing6’8” | 225Age on draft night: 19.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Carter Bryant is a prospect who could end up as a first-round pick based on potential rather than production. On paper, his numbers don’t stand out—he’s averaging just 6.3 points and 3.8 rebounds per game—but his combination of athleticism, positional size, length, and versatility firmly keeps him in the mix. At 6’8”, 225 pounds, he has the frame and skill set to play both forward spots, making him an ideal complementary piece at the NBA level.

Bryant already has an NBA body, and he does a little bit of everything—he can handle the ball in spots, knock down jumpers, and play within an offense without forcing shots.

Defensively, he has good instincts and shows real promise as a switchable defender and ball mover. His defense is what has NBA scouts buzzing, as he’s averaging just under two stocks (steals + blocks) per game in only 18 minutes per contest.

The concerns are clear—the lack of production and questions about how well his game scales up. Coming into the season, I was curious to see how he’d adjust since much of his dominance in high school came from simply being bigger, stronger, and more athletic than his peers. While he has shown some strides, he still needs to prove himself as a shooter. He’s hitting a respectable 35% from three, but his 63% free throw shooting raises some concern about whether his three-point percentage is sustainable.

Another area of concern is his decision-making. While I think he’s a good ball mover and passer, he struggled with his assist-to-turnover ratio in high school, and right now, that number is close to even at the college level.

Despite the concerns, Bryant is exactly the type of player NBA teams covet—an athletic 3-and-D wing who can defend multiple positions, handle the ball in transition, and make plays for others. However, I had an NBA scout tell me that Bryant is a “scary” prospect because he will likely impress workouts, which could lead to him being overvalued and drafted higher than he should be. That’s something to watch as we get closer to draft season.

50. Tyrese Proctor

DukeJuniorGuard6’5” | 185Age on draft night: 21.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Tyrese Proctor is playing the best basketball of his college career and has been particularly impressive as of late. While he scored just seven points against Virginia, it followed a 23-point performance against Stanford, where he shot 9-of-13 from the field and 5-of-8 from three. He also had 18 points against California (3-of-6 from three), 23 points against Clemson (4-of-8 from three), and 16 points against Syracuse (four made threes). In conference play, Proctor is averaging 12.5 points and 2.4 assists per game, while shooting 38% from three on five attempts per game—a key development in his NBA projection.

What I like about Proctor is his size at 6’5”, which allows him to play both guard spots at the next level. While he may not be the primary playmaker or table-setter I initially thought he could become as a freshman, he still brings value as a connective guard who can play on or off the ball, space the floor, provide secondary ball-handling, and make sound decisions. He also offers some defensive versatility, which will be important for his NBA role.

The biggest concerns with Proctor stem from his inability to turn the corner against defenders and his struggles finishing at the rim. He has never been an efficient finisher, and that has continued this season—he’s converting just 51% of his attempts at the rim, and if you take away his seven dunks, he’s shooting just 45% on layups. His lack of burst off the dribble and difficulty beating defenders in isolation limit him more to an off-ball role, as he struggles to get into the paint and finish effectively.

Despite those concerns, Proctor’s size, shooting, and passing ability should be enough to get him selected in the 2025 NBA Draft. If he can continue to build on his recent scoring efficiency, he could still carve out a role as a versatile combo guard at the next level.

51. Hansen Yang

Qingdao (China)Center7’2” | 250Age on draft night: 20.0

Seeing Zach Edey find success in the NBA only strengthens my belief that there’s a spot in the league for Hansen Yang. While Yang isn’t as massive as Edey at 7’5”, he’s still a towering interior presence at 7’2” with the frame, skill, rebounding, and passing ability to carve out an NBA role. He’s fluid and coordinated for his size, fundamentally sound, and in some ways, I actually think he’s more skilled in the post than Edey.

Yang’s low-post game is advanced, featuring a deep bag of moves, excellent footwork, and soft touch. He has a mix of post moves and counters, incorporating step-throughs, up-and-unders, and shoulder fakes, giving off shades of Alperen Şengün and even Kevin McHale in terms of craftiness around the rim. What really stands out is his passing—he’s an exceptional playmaker for a big man, consistently making smart reads out of the post.

Beyond his offensive skill set, Yang has also been one of the best rebounders and rim protectors in the Chinese Basketball Association (CBA). While the CBA isn’t nearly as competitive as the NBA, his dominance in those areas is still encouraging.

The concerns with Yang are fairly similar to the ones people had with Edey before his NBA transition. The biggest question is how well he can defend in space—does he have the lateral quickness and conditioning to handle NBA pace and perimeter-oriented bigs? He also struggled in the 2024 NBA Summer League, where the speed of the game led to a lot of turnovers and exposed some adjustment issues.

Another area of concern is his face-up game and shooting range. He doesn’t space the floor, which raises questions about his offensive versatility at the next level. Additionally, there’s a tendency for him to be a bit too passive at times, which isn’t something that was discussed as much with Edey but is noticeable in Yang’s game—he has a bit of a “gentle giant” mentality when he should be playing more physically.

Overall, I still believe Hansen Yang is absolutely worth the gamble and is a Top 50 prospect. His size, skill, rebounding, passing, and post scoring make him an intriguing option for teams looking for a traditional yet skilled big—even if he may take time to adjust to NBA speed and physicality.

52. Donovan Dent

New MexicoJuniorPoint Guard6’2” | 185

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Donovan Dent is one of my favorite point guards in this class and, in my opinion, one of the most underrated prospects in the 2025 NBA Draft. He’s having a phenomenal junior season, averaging 19.6 points and 6.5 assists while shooting 49% from the field and 36% from three.

What stands out about Dent is his playmaking ability—I consider him one of the top five passers in this class. He’s an excellent live-dribble playmaker, sees passing angles others don’t, and thrives operating out of the pick-and-roll. He consistently finds cutters, open shooters, and rolling bigs, making him a high-level floor general. But he’s not just a passer—he’s also a proven scorer, averaging nearly 20 points per game.

Dent’s burst and speed stand out, especially in the open floor, where he constantly pressures the rim. He’s a crafty finisher, using a mix of wrong-hand finishes, body control, and creative angles to convert inside. His ability to change speeds makes him tough to stay in front of, and he’s an efficient three-level scorer who keeps defenses honest.

One concern is his three-point shooting volume. While he’s shooting 36% from deep this season and shot 37% last year, he’s doing so on very low volume—just 1.9 attempts per game this year and 1.1 for his career. He may need to become a more aggressive shooter to keep defenses from sagging off.

Another area of growth has been his free-throw shooting. He’s getting to the line six times per game and has improved his free throw percentage into the high 70s after spending his first two seasons in the 60s.

The biggest question mark will be his size, as smaller guards often face an uphill battle in the NBA. However, Dent has a strong, muscular frame, which should help him handle physicality at the next level.

Overall, Donovan Dent is absolutely a draftable prospect in the 2025 NBA Draft, and I believe he has the skill set, playmaking, and scoring ability to warrant real consideration.

53. Amari Williams

KentuckySeniorCenter7’0” | 259

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Amari Williams was on NBA radars after an impressive career at Drexel, where he developed from a seldom-used freshman averaging just one point per game into a legitimate NBA prospect by his senior year. Opting to transfer up for his fifth season, Williams landed at Kentucky, where his production has remained steady. He’s currently averaging 11 points, 8.8 rebounds, and a career-high 3.0 assists per game, while also contributing 1.4 blocks and shooting a career-best 59% from the field.

What stands out about Williams is his blend of size, skill, and versatility at the center position. At 6’10” with a reported 7’5” wingspan, he’s a strong interior presence who can handle the ball, face up, and create for others as a connective passer. He’s also a solid athlete and rebounder who protects the rim and brings a strong defensive résumé, having been named CAA Defensive Player of the Year twice and earning CAA All-Defense honors multiple times. His ability to impact the game as a passer from the five-spot is particularly intriguing.

The concerns for Williams start with floor spacing, as he doesn’t offer much shooting range and has historically been a poor free-throw shooter. Another area of improvement is finishing with his right hand, as he is heavily left-hand dominant, often leaving points on the table because he has zero counter moves over his left shoulder. His inability to stretch the floor and inconsistent finishing versatility could impact his NBA role.

That said, his defensive versatility, rebounding, and passing ability make him an intriguing depth option for NBA teams seeking a mobile, high-motor big who can contribute in short-roll situations, move the ball, and defend multiple areas of the floor.

54. Ryan Kalkbrenner

CreightonSeniorCenter7’1” | 270

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

When it comes to scoring in the paint, very few in college basketball are more efficient than Ryan Kalkbrenner. He’s a career 66% shooter from the field over 159 games, making him one of the most reliable interior scorers in the country. At 7’1”, 270 pounds, he’s a massive presence in the paint, but what makes him special is his agility, coordination, and soft touch around the rim. He can score over both shoulders, finishes with both hands, and plays with patience and poise in the post.

Kalkbrenner is also an underrated passer, showing a knack for finding cutters and shooters when defenses collapse on him. Fundamentally, he’s as sound as they come—he keeps the ball high, uses a reliable jump hook, and is virtually unstoppable in one-on-one situations at the college level. He embodies everything you look for in a traditional big man, with elite footwork, composure, and a strong interior presence.

The concerns with Kalkbrenner mostly revolve around how well his game translates to the NBA. Despite being a three-time Big East Defensive Player of the Year, there are valid questions about his ability to defend in space at the next level. He’s mobile and agile for his size, but he’s not an ideal NBA athlete, and teams will likely test his lateral quickness in pick-and-roll situations.

Another concern is his offensive versatility—he doesn’t space the floor, as nearly all of his production comes in the paint. That makes him a throwback center, which can be a tough archetype to find a role for in today’s NBA.

Simply put, Kalkbrenner is a player born in the wrong era. If this were 2004 instead of 2025, he’d undoubtedly be a lottery pick. However, in today’s pace-and-space league, teams may hesitate to invest high draft capital in a traditional, interior-focused center, despite his dominance at the college level.

55. Otega Oweh

KentuckyJuniorWing6’4” | 215

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Otega Oweh is firmly on NBA radars and has put himself in a strong position to be drafted with his play this season. He showed flashes last year at Oklahoma as an athletic wing who can score, rebound, and defend, but this season, he’s taken another step forward. He’s been aggressive attacking the rim, averaging five free throw attempts per game, and has consistently found ways to impact games with his energy, athleticism, and defensive potential.

What stands out most about Oweh is his physical tools, athleticism, and motor, all of which give him the potential to be a high-level defender at the NBA level. He has the frame, lateral quickness, and instincts to defend multiple positions and make an impact on that end of the floor.

The biggest concern is his outside shooting, which could determine both how high he gets drafted and how successful he’ll be in the NBA. As a sophomore, he shot 37% from three, but it came on low volume (1.7 attempts per game). This year, he’s increased his attempts to 2.4 per game, but his percentage has dipped slightly to 34%.

If Oweh can prove to teams that he can knock down open shots consistently while fully embracing a defensive-minded role, he has the tools to carve out a solid NBA career.

56. Rocco Zikarsky

Brisbane Bullets (Australia)Center7’3” | 225Age on draft night: 18.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Rocco Zikarsky will likely test the waters in the 2025 NBA Draft, and based on feedback, he may choose to continue playing in Australia or even explore the college route. While this season has been somewhat disappointing due to limited playing time in the NBL, I still believe he’s absolutely worth taking a swing on.

At 7’3”, Zikarsky is a massive interior presence with a rare combination of size, mobility, and skill. When he’s at his best, you see a 7-footer who is a good athlete, plays with a motor, and has a bit of toughness to him. He looks to finish everything around the rim with dunks, is fundamentally sound, and has soft touch with both hands. He’s also nimble and agile enough to be a scoring threat as a roll man and lob target while showing flashes of ball-handling and passing ability.

The concerns with Zikarsky stem from how little we’ve seen of him at a high level. Against his peers, he has looked dominant, which is what has made him such a compelling long-term prospect. However, in Australia’s NBL, he’s been limited to very small flashes, and when he has played, he’s struggled. It’s clear that the coaching staff doesn’t fully trust him in a rotation role, and the lack of developmental minutes may have stagnated his growth.

That said, one thing I’ve noticed about Australian players in general is that they’re very skilled, fundamentally sound, and often good connective passers and playmakers. With Zikarsky’s rare size and mobility, I think he is 100% worth the gamble for a team in the 2025 NBA Draft—after all, 7’3” mobile centers don’t come around very often.

57. Johann Grünloh

SC Rasta Vechta (Germany)Center6’11” | 220Age on draft night: 19.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Johann Grünloh is an intriguing prospect that NBA teams have been closely monitoring this season, as he has shown flashes of potential in Germany’s top league. At 6’11”, Grünloh possesses good size for a modern big and is a fundamentally sound player who runs the floor well, has an active motor, and has good mobility for his position.

What makes Grünloh particularly interesting is his shot-blocking instincts and his potential to be a floor-spacing big. He has excellent timing as a rim protector, and his ability to alter shots in the paint makes him an appealing defensive prospect. Offensively, he has shown promise as an inside-out threat, with the ability to score around the basket and pick-and-pop for jumpers. If he can fully develop his shooting consistency, he could be a valuable modern-day stretch big.

The biggest concerns with Grünloh stem from the fact that he is still a long-term project. He has a lean frame and will need to bulk up to handle NBA physicality. He can also be turnover-prone, particularly in post-up situations, where he has a tendency to be passive at times. However, this isn’t uncommon for a teenager playing in a professional league against older, more experienced competition.

Overall, Grünloh’s blend of size, mobility, shot-blocking, and potential as a floor spacer makes him an interesting developmental prospect. While he will need time to refine his offensive game and add strength, his defensive instincts and two-way potential make him a name to watch in the 2025 NBA Draft.

58. Mouhamed Faye

Reggio Emilia (Italy)Center6’10” | N/AAge on draft night: 20.4

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Mouhamed Faye is steadily building his draft stock with strong production in Italy this season. Through 28 games, he’s averaging 9 points, 6.8 rebounds, and 1.5 blocks, all while shooting an efficient 63% from the field. His role is clearly defined—he thrives as a play-finishing big, primarily scoring on dunks, dump-offs, and putbacks around the rim.

What makes Faye intriguing is his blend of size, length, athleticism, and motor. As a teenager competing at a professional level, he has already shown he can impact games with his energy, rim protection, and ability to finish efficiently. His vertical spacing and lob threat potential make him a valuable frontcourt piece, especially for teams looking to add athleticism and defensive versatility.

The concerns with Faye are that he’s still pretty raw and doesn’t provide much outside of play-finishing and rim protection. While that’s perfectly fine for his role, he’s still a few years away from being NBA-ready and could be a draft-and-stash candidate. His development will likely determine how quickly he can contribute at the next level.

59. Grant Nelson

AlabamaSeniorForward6’11” | 230Age on draft night: 23.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Grant Nelson remains one of the more intriguing prospects in this class, even with a large sample size of what he brings to the table. His athleticism, ball-handling, shot-blocking, and ability to run the floor in transition make him a unique frontcourt option. I believe there’s a role for him as a play finisher, and he has made noticeable strides with his toughness this season.

Last year, after transferring from North Dakota State, the jump in competition seemed like an uphill battle, but he has definitely improved in his second season at Alabama. Every now and then, he’ll put together a monster performancethat reminds you of his upside. For example, about a month ago against Kentucky, he posted 25 points, 11 rebounds, and got to the foul line 10 times while playing aggressively. Earlier in the season, he had 23 points and 8 reboundsagainst Illinois.

However, the concerns with Nelson are fairly clear. His shooting has not improved the way many had hoped—he’s still a 29% three-point shooter over five seasons, and his inability to consistently space the floor could hinder his draft stock. He also struggles with consistency, often following up strong performances with single-digit scoring nights and low shot attempts. Additionally, foul trouble has been an issue, limiting his ability to stay on the floor and maintain his aggression.

Despite the inconsistencies, the talent is there, and I think his combination of size, athleticism, ball-handling, passing, and rim protection will keep him on NBA radars. There are teams that will be intrigued by his skill set, and he’s a worthy draft selection for a team looking to develop an athletic big with two-way potential.

60. Koby Brea

KentuckySeniorWing6’6” | 205Age on draft night: 22.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Koby Brea is one of the best pure shooters in the 2025 NBA Draft class—plain and simple. Over 140 career games, he has connected on 43.7% of his threes, and that’s on high volume. He’s probably the only player who can say he’s experiencing a slight regression in three-point shooting while still hitting 44.6% from deep this season. Last year, he shot an absurd 49.8% from three on six attempts per game at Dayton, proving he’s one of the most dangerous floor spacers in the country.

There will always be demand for elite shooters, which is why Brea is firmly in the draft conversation. He also has good positional size at 6’6”, is a solid rebounder, and has shown flashes as a connective passer.

The main concern is whether he can defend well enough to stay on the floor in the NBA. His elite shooting virtually guarantees that he has a clear-cut role, making him an attractive prospect for teams looking to add perimeter shootingaround their stars. However, the question remains—does he have the defensive ability and athleticism to stick at the next level?

61. Zvonimir Ivišić

ArkansasSophomoreCenter7’2” | 235Age on draft night: 21.7

Coming into the season, I genuinely believed Zvonimir Ivišić had a great chance to be the best returning big man in college basketball, and I even mentioned that in my early Big Boards. But after the first couple of months, that claim looked pretty foolish, as Ivišić struggled as a sophomore and didn’t live up to the flashes he showed as a freshman, when he looked really good in limited minutes.

Now, as conference play winds down, Ivišić is finally starting to look like the player I expected. He’s had some strong performances, including a 20-point game against Missouri on 6-of-8 shooting with 2 blocks and 2 steals, a 27-point outing against Alabama where he knocked down 5-of-9 from three, added 3 blocks and 3 steals, and a 25-point performance against LSU where he shot 10-of-13 from the floor, hit 3-of-5 from deep, and recorded 4 blocks and a steal. These games showcase why I was high on him—a 7-footer who can space the floor, protect the rim, and score inside is always going to be an appealing prospect. His inside-out skill set is valuable, and when he’s on, he looks like a legitimate NBA big.

The biggest concern with Ivišić is consistency. Sandwiched between his strong performances, he had a zero-point game against Auburn, where he shot 0-for-10 from the floor (9 of those attempts were threes) and didn’t get to the free-throw line once. Additionally, while he looks like a good rim protector on paper, he has been targeted in SEC play, and one scout even told me they believe he’s one of the worst defensive bigs in this draft class. At this point, I have to ask: Is he being held back, or has he simply not developed as expected? Playing at Kentucky and Arkansas, has he been unable to fully showcase his talent, or is he just not the player I initially thought he was? For Ivišić to fall this far in my rankings means I’ve probably come to terms with the latter—he’s not the dominant returning big I envisioned heading into his freshman season.

62. Bogoljub Markovic

KK Mega Soccerbet (Serbia)Forward6’11” | 195Age on draft night: 19.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

I’ve had the opportunity to scout Bogoljub Markovic multiple times over the years, dating back to the Adidas Next Generation Tournament in 2022 and Basketball Without Borders All-Star Weekend in 2023. At 6’11”, he has added strength to his frame but still maintains a lean, wiry build. The best way to describe Markovic is "toolsy"—he’s fluid, mobile, and plays with a high motor while also showcasing a good feel as a passer and ball mover. Despite his frame, he plays tough and competes hard on both ends.

Offensively, Markovic displays a solid array of low-post moves and overall skill in the paint, though his lack of strength can limit his ability to establish deep post position. He makes up for it with rebounding, passing, and improving shooting touch. He’s also comfortable handling the ball and can push the pace in transition.

Defensively, his length and mobility allow him to guard in space, protect the rim, and disrupt passing lanes, making him a versatile modern NBA defender. His defensive impact and ability to finish plays make him an intriguing prospect, but his long-term success will depend on adding more strength and continuing to develop his skill set.

The biggest question is whether he has a defining NBA skill to lean on. While he’s versatile on both ends, there are concerns about whether his shooting will hold up at the next level. He’s currently knocking down 37% from three, and if he can provide consistent floor spacing, his chances of sticking in the NBA increase significantly. Markovic’s flashes of interior scoring, floor spacing, and defensive versatility make him a high-upside swing in the second round for teams willing to bet on his development.

63. Xaivian Lee

PrincetonJuniorGuard6’4” | 180Age on draft night: 21.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Princeton’s Xaivian Lee continues to put up impressive numbers and consistently fills up the stat sheet. He’s a crafty and creative scorer, a smart, intuitive cutter, and has shown the ability to score at all three levels on the college level. Lee is also a strong rebounder for a guard, a capable playmaker, and just has a knack for impacting the game in multiple ways.

He’s not simply dominating Ivy League competition—he’s had strong performances against higher-level opponents as well. Lee opened the season with 27 points, 8 assists, and 4 rebounds against Iona. In a matchup against St. Joe’s, a team that features potential first-round pick Rasheed Fleming and two two-way prospects in Erik Reynolds II and Xzayvier Brown, Lee led Princeton to victory with a triple-double—posting 18 points, 13 rebounds, 10 assists, and 2 steals on 7-of-14 shooting. He also had a standout game against Rutgers, a team that features two of the top three players in this draft class, finishing with 21 points, 11 assists, 6 rebounds, and 3 steals, despite an off-shooting night (7-of-22 from the floor).

I’m curious to see whether Lee tests the waters this year or returns to Princeton, but he definitely has the game and skill set to attract NBA scouts. The concerns lie in how his game scales up to the NBA level. While he’s a capable shot-maker, will he be consistent enough as a shooter to excel in a smaller role where he isn’t asked to carry such a heavy offensive burden?

64. John Poulakidas

YaleSeniorWing6’6” | 205Age on draft night: 22.2

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

In my opinion, John Poulakidas is the best shooter in the country due to both his volume and versatility as a shooter. He’s not just a standstill, catch-and-shoot threat—he can fire off movement, pull-ups, and tough contested looks. He’s a career 40% shooter from three, having maintained that efficiency over the last three college seasons while taking a high volume of difficult attempts.

Poulakidas first caught my attention during the 2023 NCAA Tournament, when he lit up Auburn for 28 points, shooting 6-of-9 from three. He’s carried that momentum into this season, averaging 19.5 points per game. Most recently, he broke out of a rare shooting slump with a 28-point performance on 11-of-19 shooting, leading Yale to a win over Columbia. Before that, he had three tough outings where he shot a combined 12-of-44 from the field and just 5-of-26 from three, bringing his overall percentages down slightly. But even with that cold stretch, he remains one of the most lethal shooters in the country, and I expect NBA teams to take notice.

The biggest question is how he’ll hold up defensively. That’s likely going to be the determining factor in whether he hears his name called on draft night or ends up as an early two-way signing. He has a clear, projectable role as a floor spacer, but with most shooting specialists, teams will want to know if he can defend well enough to stay on the floor at the NBA level.

65. Miles Rubin

Loyola-ChicagoSophomoreCenter6’10” | 210Age on draft night: 20.9

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Miles Rubin continues to catch my attention as a long-term NBA prospect. On paper, his numbers don’t necessarily jump out, as he’s averaging 9 points, 5 rebounds, and shooting 68% from the floor, but it’s his defensive impact that really stands out. Rubin is a high-level rim protector and, despite playing just 24 minutes per game, ranks among the best shot blockers in the country.

He’s a good athlete, not overly explosive, but mobile and coordinated enough to play a role as a vertical lob threat. He has shown flashes of offensive skill, particularly with his left-handed push shot, and has demonstrated promise as a face-up scorer, occasionally putting the ball on the floor to attack slower defenders. His motor is solid, and he has the defensive tools to switch in space. Last year, as a freshman, he led the country in block percentage and recorded eight games with four or more blocks. This season, he already has five games with at least four blocks, putting him on pace to surpass last year’s mark.

The concerns for Rubin start with his thin frame—he’s listed at 6’10”, 210 pounds, and will need to add strength to hold his own at the next level. Statistically, his development hasn’t taken as big of a leap as expected. While he has improved, I was hoping for more involvement offensively. Additionally, he’s not an elite rebounder, averaging just 5 rebounds per game, which is an area that needs improvement. Despite these concerns, I still see a potential long-term fit for him in the NBA as an energy big and rim protector, even if he’s slightly undersized for the role.

66. Jamir Watkins

Florida StateSeniorWing6’7” | 210Age on draft night: 23.11

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Jamir Watkins is a prospect with a wide draft range, as some teams are high on his skill set, while others, despite his improvements, may have preferred his game last season. Watkins is a tough, aggressive downhill slasher who consistently generates paint touches and free throw opportunities. Last year, he led Florida State in scoring, rebounding, steals, and tied for first in assists per game. This season, his production has increased, particularly in scoring and three-point volume, while still maintaining his ability to attack the rim. Watkins is getting to the free throw line 7.7 times per game, averaging 5.3 rebounds and 1.3 steals per contest. At 6’7”, he has the positional size, strength, and skill set to contribute as a wing who can attack closeouts, create off the dribble, and provide some connective passing.

The main concern with Watkins is his outside shooting—a question mark that has followed him throughout his career. Last season, he was a reluctant three-point shooter, attempting just 2.9 threes per game, but this year, he has upped his volume to 5.0 attempts per game while still shooting just 33% from deep. He is a player who thrives attacking the paint, preferring to slash rather than settle for jumpers. If he can become a more efficient shooter from three and provide more reliable floor spacing, it would significantly boost his draft stock.

Another concern is his decision-making as a playmaker. While he has flashes of connective passing, his assist-to-turnover ratio remains a concern. Over his college career, he has averaged more turnovers than assists, and this season, he is posting a career-high 2.8 turnovers per game, with 77 turnovers compared to just 60 assists. Watkins' physicality, ability to get downhill, rebounding, and toughness are all attractive traits, but improving his shooting efficiency and decision-making will determine how high he goes in the draft.

67. Chaz Lanier

TennesseeSeniorWing6’4” | 200Age on draft night: 23.5

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Chaz Lanier is one of the best shooters in the country, knocking down 41% of his threes on a high volume of 8.4 attempts per game. He first caught my attention last season at North Florida, where he averaged 19.7 points and shot an elite 44% from deep. After four years at North Florida, Lanier transferred to Tennessee, and his transition to SEC competition has been seamless. He’s averaging 18 points per game, ranking among the conference leaders in scoring and three-point percentage. Lanier is a dead-eye shooter who is lethal off the catch, can knock down shots off the dribble, and is a solid athlete capable of attacking closeouts with straight-line drives.

The biggest concerns for Lanier start with his age—he’ll be 23 years old on draft night, making him exactly five years older than Cooper Flagg. While age alone isn’t a dealbreaker, it does raise questions about his long-term upsidecompared to younger prospects. Another concern is his impact outside of scoring, as he averages just one combined steal and block per game and isn’t known for his defensive playmaking. He’s also not a great rebounder or passer, averaging only one assist per game. His game is heavily reliant on his shooting, but he does play within Tennessee’s defensive system, which requires commitment on that end of the floor. Ultimately, Lanier projects as an intriguing option for teams looking for an immediate floor spacer and instant offense off the bench.

68. Jacksen Moni

North Dakota StateSeniorForward6’10” | 235Age on draft night: 22.4

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Jacksen Moni has burst onto the NBA radar this season, emerging as a must-watch prospect for scouts. At 6'10", he’s skilled, versatile, and efficient, with the ability to handle the ball, facilitate offense, and score around the rim. He leads his team in assists and has been an incredibly efficient scorer, posting 20 points, 5 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game on impressive 50/40/83 shooting splits. However, the main reason NBA scouts are making the trip to North Dakota is his elite outside shooting—he’s knocking down 40% from three on nearly six attempts per game. With his size and skill set, Moni projects as a pick-and-pop threat or stretch big who can also put the ball on the floor and make plays.

The concerns with Moni start with his athletic limitations. He’s not an explosive athlete, and his defensive impact is minimal, averaging less than one combined steal and block per game. Additionally, despite his size, he’s not a strong rebounder, which raises questions about his ability to hold his own physically at the next level. Still, his shooting, passing, and offensive versatility make him an intriguing stretch big who could carve out a role as a floor-spacing, connective piece in the NBA.

69. Walter Clayton Jr.

FloridaSeniorGuard6’3” | 195Age on draft night: 22.3

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Walter Clayton Jr. has been one of the most productive guards in college basketball over the last three seasons, and this year, he’s playing a key role for a 24-3 Florida team. He leads the Gators in scoring and assists, and his ability to knock down shots and create offense has been instrumental to their success.

Clayton’s appeal as an NBA prospect comes from his ability to get hot and put up points in bunches. He’s a versatile shot-maker, capable of scoring off the dribble, spotting up, and creating his own offense at all three levels. Over the years, he’s steadily improved his efficiency and playmaking, and this season, he’s averaging a career-high four assists per game—a sign of progress in his ability to facilitate.

The main concern with Clayton is his streaky shooting and the fact that he’s not a natural table-setter or true point guard. At 6’3”, he’s a bit undersized to play the two, and while he’s improved as a passer, there are still questions about his ability to run an offense at the next level. However, his scoring ability, toughness, and shot-making make him an intriguing option for teams in need of instant offense off the bench.

If he can continue to prove he’s capable of running a team and maintaining efficiency as a shooter, he could hear his name called on draft night. More likely, he’s a strong candidate for a two-way contract, where he could develop in the G-League and work his way onto an NBA roster. Clayton is the type of player who could carve out a role with the right opportunity, especially if he keeps refining his playmaking and decision-making.

70. Neoklis Avdalas

Peristeri (Greece)Guard6’8” | 190Age on draft night: 19.4

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Neoklis Avdalas is one of the more intriguing prospects in this class, and his draft range could be fairly wide. His game is defined more by his potential and physical tools than his production, making him an upside swing for the right team.

At 6’8”, Avdalas is a fluid athlete with point-forward skills, showing flashes as a playmaker and ball-handler with some offensive creativity. However, I believe he’s been somewhat restricted playing in Greece, where he hasn’t been given the freedom to truly showcase his talent. When comparing him to Ben Saraf, I honestly don’t see much of a talent gap—if any. The key difference is that Saraf plays for Ratiopharm Ulm, a team that allows young players to play significant minutes and work through mistakes. If Avdalas had the same opportunity, I think he could thrive in a similar way.

The concerns surrounding Avdalas are consistency and production. While he’s 6’8” with legitimate ball-handling ability, the talent and output haven’t always aligned, and his development has seemed to stall at times. That said, he is starting to flash in the Greek League, showing signs of improvement. He’ll need to become a more consistent playmaker and decision-maker, and of course, his shooting remains a swing skill. But he has made strides this season, shooting 40% from three overall, which is an encouraging sign.

Avdalas is the type of player who could end up being one of the biggest surprises on draft night if a team believes in his potential. However, there are also several variables surrounding his path—he could opt for the college route, become a draft-and-stash candidate, or continue his development overseas. His situation remains one to watch as we approach the 2025 NBA Draft.

71. Tomislav Ivišić

IllinoisSophomoreCenter7’1” | 230Age on draft night: 21.7

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Tomislav Ivišić has played his way into one-and-done consideration with his strong freshman campaign. He’s averaging 12 points, 8 rebounds, 1.2 blocks, and 2 assists per game, showing the skill set of a modern big with some traditional elements.

The twin brother of Zvonimir Ivišić, Tomislav has a different playstyle, leaning more toward a back-to-the-basket scorer with pick-and-pop potential. He’s shooting a respectable 34% from three, showing flashes of floor-spacing ability. While he’s skilled in the post, has solid touch, and is a capable passer, he still projects more as a traditional interior big who can step out occasionally rather than a full-time stretch big.

The concerns for Ivišić center around his defensive mobility and shooting consistency. Can he defend in space at the NBA level? Is he a good enough shooter to thrive as a true floor-spacing big? And does he have the athleticism to keep up in an increasingly fast-paced league? His shooting remains streaky, which raises questions about how well his pick-and-pop game will translate.

Ivišić is a legit NBA prospect, but his draft range is wide. He could be a second-round pick in 2025 if he stays in the draft, but given his age and room for development, returning for another year might be the better long-term moveunless he’s fully committed to turning pro.

72. Alex Toohey

SydneyForward6’8” | 225Age on draft night: 21.1

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Alex Toohey is a prospect with a wide range of opinions—some scouts are high on him, while others struggle to pinpoint exactly what he brings to the table. He does a little bit of everything well—he’s a decent scorer off the dribble, a solid playmaker for his size, he moves without the ball, decent rebounder, and good athlete. Coming off a solid season where he averaged 10 points, 4 rebounds, and 1.3 assists per game, Toohey also produced several highlight-reel dunks that showcased his athleticism.

However, the biggest concern surrounding Toohey remains his outside shooting. It’s been the biggest knock on him for a while, and despite showing some flashes in the NBL Blitz preseason tournament, where he shot 75% from three over two games while averaging 25 points on absurd 60/75 shooting splits, his regular-season shooting numbers fell back to earth. He finished the season shooting 30% from deep, which is an improvement from last season’s 25%, but still a major question mark.

The swing skill for Toohey is the jumper—while he does a lot of things well, what is his standout NBA skill? He’s not an elite ball handler, rebounder, or defender, and if the shooting doesn’t improve, it’s tough to project his NBA role. That said, his versatility, energy, and passing ability could help him carve out a role as a glue-guy, connective forward, making him an intriguing name to monitor.

73. Darrion Williams

Texas TechSophomoreWing6’6” | 225Age on draft night: 22.1

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Darrion Williams is one of the more unique prospects in this class. Listed at 6’6”, 225 pounds, he’s a player who impacts the game in a variety of ways and consistently fills the stat sheet. This season, he’s averaging 14.9 points, 5.2 rebounds, and 4 assists per game, showing noticeable growth as a scorer and playmaker compared to last season when he put up 11.4 points, 7.7 rebounds, and 2.7 assists per game. However, his rebounding numbers have dipped, and his three-point shooting has regressed from an eye-popping 46% last season (on 2.9 attempts per game) to 33% this year on nearly double the volume.

Williams does several things well—he’s a capable shooter, effective scorer on the move, solid rebounder, and a good connective passer. However, the concerns are centered around his athleticism and physical tools. He’s not an explosive leaper, doesn’t blow by defenders off the dribble, and lacks elite physical traits that typically translate to the NBA level. Despite those limitations, his versatile skill set, passing ability, and rebounding at his size make him an intriguing prospect for teams looking for a high-IQ, do-it-all wing with offensive versatility.

74. Eric Dixon

VillanovaSeniorPost6’8” | 265Age on draft night: 24.4

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Eric Dixon has been phenomenal this season for Villanova, averaging 22.9 points, 5.3 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game while maintaining efficient shooting splits of 45-42-80. His production has taken a significant leap from last season, where he put up 16.0 points and 6.5 rebounds on 46-34-86 splits. That jump, combined with the fact that he's currently leading the nation in scoring, has put him on the NBA radar despite Villanova’s struggles in the post-Jay Wright era.

At 6’8”, 255 pounds, Dixon is a wide-bodied big with a soft shooting touch, an effective post game, and the ability to space the floor as a pick-and-pop threat. He’s a good finisher around the basket, scores well on post-ups and cuts, and has the skill and feel to be an offensive weapon at the next level. However, the concerns for Dixon start with his athleticism—he’s a below-the-rim finisher and my struggle defendin laterally and vertically. He’s a solid but unspectacular rebounder, and his game feels tailor-made for the 1990s, when bruising power forwards had a bigger role.

The biggest obstacle for Dixon’s draft stock is his age. He will be 24 years old on draft night, which could significantly impact where he’s selected. The production is undeniable, but NBA teams tend to prioritize younger prospects with more developmental runway. Despite that, his shooting, skill, and feel for the game could still make him an intriguing two-way contract candidate or late second-round pick for a team in need of a floor-spacing big with high-level experience and polish.

75. Sion James

DukeSeniorWing6’6” | 220Age on draft night: 22.6

Big Board 2.0 Rank: NR

Duke’s Sion James is a name that has been in NBA circles for a few years now. After initially declaring for the draft while at Tulane, he opted to return to school, refine his game, and eventually transfer to Duke to compete on a bigger stage. This season, James has embraced his role as a glue guy, providing efficient, two-way play while taking a backseat to Duke’s more heralded prospects. His production has been solid across the board, averaging 4.0 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game, while shooting 52% from the field, 40% from three, and 80% from the free-throw line.

At 6’6”, 220 pounds, James is a versatile, switchable defender with a strong frame that allows him to guard multiple positions. He’s also a capable ball handler and playmaker, operating as a connective piece who can initiate offense in spurts and provide secondary creation. One of the biggest developments in his game has been his improved outside shooting. In his first three seasons, he shot around 33% from three, but last year he made a significant leap to 38%. The question entering this season was whether he could sustain that level of shooting at Duke, and so far, he’s proved he can.

The concerns for James come down to role definition at the next level. While he does a lot of things well, he doesn’t necessarily have one elite skill to hang his hat on. His versatility is both a strength and a challenge, as teams may struggle to pinpoint exactly how to maximize him in an NBA rotation. Additionally, while his shooting numbers have been strong, some scouts may still have lingering questions about its long-term sustainability. Despite these concerns, his defensive versatility, size, and ability to contribute in multiple areas could make him an attractive second-round option or a priority two-way contract candidate for teams looking for a high-IQ role player who impacts winning.